Geoffrey Chaucer was an English poet, alchemist and philosopher from 14th century, who was called "the Father of English literature". Some of his most famous works include "The House of Fame" and " the Legend of Good Women".
I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
At the Yalta conference, significant concessions were made to the Soviet Union because the Western Allies wanted the U.S.S.R. to join the war against Japan. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option or option "B". I hope that this is the answer that has helped you.
During World War II there were two sides: the Allies, which the US were a part of, which included, among others, UK, France, Soviet Union (after 1941), and the allies (Germany, Japan, Italy and their puppet states).
So the answer can be any of the allies: UK, France, Soviet Union but also the whole of Latin America, most of Africa and Asia.
