Answer:
60.28%
Explanation:
The selling price per chair = $179.49
buying price per chair = $87.49
the overhead rate is 28%
Actual overheard = 28% x $87.49
=28/100 x 87.49
=0.28 x 87.49
=$24.4972
total cost price per chair = $87.49 + $24.4972
=$111.98
profit per chair
= $179.49 - $111.98
=67.51
Profitability rate = 67.51/111.98 x 100
=60.28%
Answer:
The price/earnings ratio is closest to 21.79
Explanation:
Price / Earning ratio is used to assess the owner`s appraisal of share value. The higher the ratio the more confident that the shareholders have on company's future performance.
Price / Earning ratio = Market price of Share ÷ Earnings per share
= $61 ÷ $2.80
= 21.79
Answer:
No all customers are diffrent one might like the smell of lavender when one customer might hate lavender and like the smell of honey.
Explanation:
Answer: See Explanation
Explanation:
The payback period for both projects would be calculated as:
Alpha Project
Cost = $530,000
Annual net cash flow = $60,000
Payback period = Cash / Annual net cash flow
= $530,000 / $60,000
= 8.83
Beta Project
Cost = $170,000
Annual net cash flow = $18,000
Payback period = Cash / Annual net cash flow
= $170,000 / $18,000
= 9.4
We can see that Alpha Project is better as the payback period is lesser than Beta project
Answer:
The explanation is given below:
Explanation:
According to this situation it can be defined as
Pursuant to U.C.C. § 3-203, transfer of instrument is when an instrument is delivered by a person other than an issuer for the purpose of giving to a receiver the right to enforce the instrument. The transfer vests in a transferee the transferor's right to enforce the instrument. The rights include the right as a holder in due course. However, the transferee cannot acquire rights of a holder in due course by a transfer, directly or indirectly, from a holder in due course if the transferee engaged in fraud or illegality affecting the instrument. When an instrument is transferred for value , a transferee does not become a holder because of lack of indorsement. Moreover, when a transferor purports to transfer less than the entire instrument, the negotiation of the instrument does not occur.
The best response of Fannie mae’s to this argument is because Becky Smith signed a note and she cannot own that property as the note was in country home loans name and he defaulted payment under that law.
