1. How did segregation manifest itself in daily life in the South? (What was life like for

1 answer:

6 0

1. Being black in the south was very hard especially in the early days of Jim Crow. Lynchings were not uncommon, and violence towards black people was constant. It broke down black people emotionally and physically. Black people couldn't go to better schools, they couldn't go to libraries, and they were pushed away from any public place because of there skin.

2. Segregation disenfranchised black peoples right to vote. There was a huge scheme from the racist democratic party against black voters. Black people almost always voted republican because they valued small government and individual freedom. Democrats would never win because of the black vote in many states. This lead to many Democratic leaders to ban the black vote. This lead to the democratic party almost destroying the republican party. This lead black people to feel that they werent as american as everyone else.

3. The brown vs board education case was a unananimous decision to get rid of segregation in schools as it was unconstitutional, and completely unfair towards balck people trying to get a better education. This had a major impact on segregation laws because now people were looking at the unjustices done to the black community, and made lots of people siding with black people instead of the racist laws in the south.

4. This lynching became a major thing in the civil rights movement because how severe the case was. Emmet Till was horrifically beaten for apparently whistling at a white girl walking into a market. This became such a huge piece of the civil rights movement because even white people living in the south that had mixed emotions about the civil rights movement where horrified to see what a bunch of men did to a young boy. If it wasn't for the brave parents doing an open casket during Emmets funeral people wouldn't have seen the cruelty that a young innocent black kid had to endure. This showed the injustices black people had to endure during this time.

You might be interested in

What was the significance of the zhou mandate of heaven?

sveta [45]

It gave legitimacy to the form of government being established

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The Aztecs in Mexico is

babymother [125]

Answer:

They were ancient people who were involved in making chocolate

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

What is the dominant model of federalism starting with the new deal

Tanzania [10]

The dominant model of Federalism starting with the New Deal is cooperative.

8 0

4 years ago

Which of the following was NOT true of the

Mkey [24]

If the question is talking about the way itself then the answer would be A, as the war was in fact a very popular event in Britain. The person who said it was C is incorrect as the British were very well supplied by loyalist farmers and the Navy, which was one of their advantages.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Prepare a dialogue including the effect in the community in the absence of good governance.

Over [174]

Explanation:

As governance indicators have proliferated in recent years, so has their use and the controversy that surrounds them. As more and more voices are pointing out, existing indicators – many of them developed and launched in the 1990s – have a number of flaws. This is particularly disquieting at a time when governance is at the very top of the development agenda.

Many questions of crucial importance to the development community – such as issues around the relationship between governance and (inclusive) growth, or about the effectiveness of aid in different contexts – are impossible to answer with confidence as long as we do not have good enough indicators, and hence data, on governance.

The litany of problems concerning existing governance indicators has been growing:

Indicators produced by certain NGOs (e.g. the Heritage Foundation), but also by commercial risk rating agencies (such as the PRS Group), are biased towards particular types of policies, and consequently, the assessment of governance becomes mingled with the assessment of policy choices;

Many indicators rely on surveys of business people (e.g. the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey). While they have important insights into governance challenges given their interaction with government bureaucracies, the views of other stakeholders are also important and remain underrepresented, as are concerns about governance of less relevance to the business community (e.g. civil and human rights);

The other main methodology used are indicators produced by individuals or small groups of external experts – for example, the World Bank’s Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA), Bertelsmann’s Transformation Index, and the French Development Agency’s Institutional Profiles. This entails the risk that different experts ‘feed’ on each other’s ratings; and the depth to which external raters are able to explore the dimensions they are rating can vary.

3 0

3 years ago