1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kotykmax [81]
3 years ago
11

Why did Rome declare war against Carthage in the Third Punic War? I will give points and brainlist

History
1 answer:
Vika [28.1K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

c

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why did many Americans question the fairness of the military draft during the Vietnam War?
REY [17]
The questioned it because mot many people wanted to go to war and fight a war that we shouldent have been involved in<span />
4 0
3 years ago
Please help me
Lisa [10]

Answer: look up the “Korematsu” case, it talks about how the 5th amendment was violated by the Japanese-American citizens being deprived of their liberty, etc... look up the amendments that were violated with the internment camps. The constitution declares the rights of the American citizens and some of the rights were broken when the Japanese were put in internment camps. Hope this helps.

Because

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Guess the song by the lyrics
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer:

house of memories

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How did the loss of the silk road trigger Portuguese exploration??? Somebody help me ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!
Elanso [62]
A glance at a world map shows that Europe is in fact a small peninsula jutting from the enormous landmass we call "Asia." It was the Greeks who first divided the world into Europe and Asia, with the waters of the Bosporus as the conventional dividing line. Yet the language they spoke originated, like ours, in the vast steppe areas beyond the Caspian. Men of neolithic times, who moved freely from the borders of China to the Atlantic coasts of Europe, would have found the division meaningless.
At the beginning of recorded history, some time in the third millenium BC, one of the Indo-European or Indo-Aryan speaking peoples of these steppelands succeeded in domesticating the horse, revolutionizing warfare and transforming themselves almost overnight into a formidable fighting force. Wave after wave of horse nomads swept across Europe and western Asia, meeting resistance only from the sedentary civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt, which were able to withstand the assault only by adopting chariot warfare - if not mounted cavalry - themselves.

These nomads, speaking closely related languages and sharing a common social organization, were the ancestors of, among others, the Greeks, Romans, Persians, the Indo-Aryan speaking conquerors of India, and of many other lesser-known peoples who were later to play an important role in the history of the various segments of the Silk Roads.

Time and distance obscured the common geographical and linguistic origin of these widely scattered peoples, and it was not until the 19th century that the relationships among all their languages was fully worked out and their homeland in the Asian steppes identified. When Alexander fought Darius at Gaugamela, he had no notion that the Persians, at least linguistically, were cousins of the Greeks. The Greek and Roman historians who later chronicled his campaigns derived a great deal of dramatic play from the contrast between stern Macedonian virtue and the decadent luxury of the East, between Greek freedom and Persian slavery, between Europe and Asia. These attitudes penetrated deep into the European consciousness - they surface occasionally today - and erected a mental barrier at times almost as impassable as the Pamir Mountains that protected the farthest outposts of China from those the Chinese called "the western barbarians."

For the Chinese, like the Greeks - but perhaps with more reason - divided the world into civilized and barbarian. They, like their counterparts in India, Mesopotamia and Egypt, had had to face the fierce mounted bowmen of the steppes, and to survive had had to adopt their enemies' methods of warfare.

The pattern established in the second millennium BC - the settled, agriculturally-based urban civilizations of China, India and the Middle East regularly exposed to attack by mounted horsemen from Central Asia - did not end with the settling of the Indo-European speaking nomads. As they were transformed, as a result of the success of their own conquests, into urban civilized peoples themselves - Greeks, Romans, Persians and Indians - they in their turn had to defend themselves against new attacks by mounted horsemen from the Eurasian steppes - Parthians, Huns, Turks and finally Mongols. The last great wave of invasion out of Central Asia occurred in the early 15th century of our era, when Tamerlane and his Turkic- and Mongolian-speaking hordes devastated the Middle East.

It is no wonder that Ibn Khaldun, the 14th-century Arab philosopher of history, saw the history of the Middle East in terms of urban peoples periodically assaulted by mounted nomads, who then adopted the civilized ways of the peoples they conquered, became thereby decadent and in their turn submitted to a new wave of nomadic invaders. Had Chinese historians been able to read Ibn Khaldun, they would have found his paradigm borne out by their own experience.

No fully satisfactory explanation has ever been offered for the periodic explosion of nomadic peoples from - or through - Central Asia, but the pattern is clear: The region has historically been a sort of dynamo generating population movements that have affected Europe, Asia and America since the beginning of human occupation of the Eurasian landmass.

The Chinese fear of the peoples to the west was therefore not without foundation. In the third century BC the short-lived but powerful Qin Dynasty linked up a series of earlier bulwarks and formed the Great Wall, effectively separating the settled and cultivated lands of China from the nomadic herdsmen without. The Great Wall stretches from Gansu to Manchuria, a distance of 2,400 kilometers (1,500 miles). It was an effective defence against nomads who lacked both siege
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was NOT an effect of the war with Mexico?
Ganezh [65]

Answer:

yee be sure u got it right for a good job

Explanation:

brbbrbrbrbr has 5AM a little bit more to say about it and the floor was so confused bro and then you have a lot 55inches 5AM of a little bit more of a room is the same as the other hand in a hotel and I have to do it for ages to see

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Following Jay’s Treaty, George Washington’s approval rating, to borrow a modern phrase, plummeted and there was even talk in the
    5·2 answers
  • What was discovered that caused the public to view Sewart’s purchase differently? a. bronze c. iron ore b. gold d. silver Please
    5·1 answer
  • Herbert Hoover lost the 1932 presidential election to _____. Calvin Coolidge Harry Truman Warren Harding Franklin Roosevelt HELP
    7·2 answers
  • Identify what major countries<br> won World War II.
    9·1 answer
  • George Washington - Donald trump can you give me all the presidents name btw first to last?
    12·2 answers
  • What caused Islam to spread throughout Arabia?
    7·2 answers
  • What day and year did the 200 Catholics go to jamestown?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following rights is protected by the First Amendment?
    6·1 answer
  • Where did the Magyars live in relation to what was then known as Europe?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did many slaves die during the middle passsge(a p e x)
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!