I believe the last option is the correct one - <span>They were opposed to Article 10 that could infringe upon the United States’ right to declare war and expand its territories.
This particular Article meant that anyone could call America for assistance in times of war. Obviously, the US politicians were against such a decision, even though France and Britain wanted to sign it. In the end, nothing happened with this document.
</span>
Answer:
answer option 3...
major increase frm the tang era
D because in 1796, the state capital was moved from Augusta on Georgia's eastern border to Louisville in central Georgia.
The similarity between the Mughals and the Ottomans and Safavids was that they were all Islamic empires that contributed a lot in the spreading out of the Islam or strengthening it in certain areas.
The differences are that the Mughals originated from the Genghis Khan lineage, thus the Mongols, but also with high influx of Turkic and North Iranian people, while the Ottomans were a mixture of Turkic people and North Iranian people, and the Safavids were predominantly Iranian people.
The Mughals were much more tolerant towards their subjects in both cultural and religious manner, which made the empire relatively stable and made it very prosperous. Also, the Mughals in many ways acted like some of the early Islamic caliphates where they were trying to get more knowledge, focus on science and development, were obsessed with mathematics, and also they made the empire a nice mixture of Indian, Mongol, Turkic, Persian, and Islamic culture, which manifested itself in most of the things in the empire.
The downfall of the Mughals was mostly because of the strength of the British Empire that came in the South Asia region and gradually took over it.
