Couldn’t agree on territory borders
I think they didn’t really have a judgement about who owned the land but had different tribes of different people, the different tribes might’ve had controversy against each other but that isn’t exactly known. Conflicts over the use and ownership of Native lands are not new. Land has been at the center of virtually every significant interaction between Natives and non-Natives since the earliest days of European contact with the indigenous peoples of North America. By the 19th century, federal Indian land policies divided communal lands among individual tribal members in a proposed attempt to make them into farmers. The result instead was that struggling tribes were further dispossessed of their land. In recent decades, tribes, corporations, and the federal government have fought over control of Native land and resources in contentious protests and legal actions, including the Oak Flat, the San Francisco Peaks Controversy, and the Keystone XL pipeline
I'd say D. The article of Confederation didn't want the government to be too powerful and turn into a tyranny. They had a judicial branch though.
President Wilson's "Peace without victory" idea formed a key part of the fourteen points B. hope this love.
Explanation:
in Britain turnpike trusts were generally succesful in increasing road maintenance and investment.On average they spent 10 and 20 times more than the parishes they replaced.Most trusts purchased land and materials in order to widen their roads and improve the surface.
