Answer:
d. by moving and refuting the counterclaim at the end
Explanation:
According to the given draft paragraph from an argumentative essay, the narrator talks about the effect of the World War and tries to justify the use of the hydrogen bomb on Japan which led to their unconditional surrender by saying that it helped end the war quickly and save more lives.
However, at the end, he just says that the effects of the radiation were still there, without any preamble or prior claim
The author should revise the paragraph by moving and refuting the counterclaim at the end. This is because, they are not a suitable conclusion to the draft paragraph.
I think D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.........................v
.................................
................................
John adams
samuel adams
Josiah Barlett
George clymer
William Floyd
Answer:
D. ...she settled over a meal of broken bones, a back alley Cleopatra.
Explanation:
The detail from the text that contains an allusion is ''...she settled over a meal of broken bones, a back alley Cleopatra''
Allusion is known to be a brief and indirect reference to a person, thing, place or idea of historical significance. In allusion, it does not describe in detail the reference (i.e the person or thing to which it refers). It actually passes a comment. Then the writer actually expects the reader to understand the allusion and grasp its importance as used in a text.
In the above answer, the author makes allusion to the meal of broken bones referring it to ''a back alley Cleopatra''. Therefore, Option D is correct answer.
