Right of the bat, we know that options B and D are incorrect because the go against the grammatical rules for comparatives and superlatives. That leaves us with the real question, what should we use here? Comparatives or superlatives?
Because the example sentence mentions twins (a pair of siblings) we can conclude that a comparative would be the best modifier to use. Take into consideration that comparatives come along with a specific grammatical structure (subject + to be + comparative + <em>than</em> + object [Jeff is a better listener than <em>Twin B</em>]). In this case, Jeff is the better listener.
Answer:
i would think it would mean you wanted to be around that person at all times
Explanation:
Answer:
Its hard because most people are lazy they don't want to spent time understanding and finding ways to abide new ideas they was to sick to the same thing to avoid more work. People don't like change like new ideas of thinking as it causes them to have to spend time understanding that new was of thinking, either way this all links with change hope this helps.
Answer:
Option E
Explanation:
A good writer keeps on changing his/her writing skill based on the changes in his surrounding. Thus, writing is a continuous process of improvement and not an inherent ability of the writer.
Along with the writing skills, the perspective of the writer too is in continuous mode of variation and hence even the perspective of writer is not inherent.
Thus, option E is correct