I believe your answer is 1. character versus society. Hope this helped!
Thanks!
~Steve
Parasites. all of those are parasitic relationships
The two things was that he was born in a rich family and he had a fairy tale as his sister
In the first sentence the subject is "urban sprawl" and the rest of the sentence is the predicate. In the second sentence, the subject is "Growing families" and the rest of the sentence is the predicate.
The subject of a sentence is the term that suffers or provokes the action of the verb of the sentence, while the predicate is all the terms that deny or affirm something about the subject.
In this case, it is important that you know which term is the verb of each sentence, as this term is essential for the subject to be found.
The verb is the term that indicates an action, or a state of the individual. In the two sentences presented above, the verbs are "to harm" and "to want."
Knowing which term is the verb of the sentence, you can find the subject and predicate as follows:
- To find the subject, ask who is causing or suffering the action of seeing.
- In the first sentence: Who is harming the habitat? Who is harming the habitat is urban expansion. In this case, urban expansion is the subject of the sentence.
- In the second sentence: Who wants bigger houses and yards? Growing families. Hence, growing families are the subject of the sentence.
- To find the predicate, identify what is being said about the subject of each sentence.
- In the first sentence: What is urban expansion doing? It's harming the habitat.
- In the second sentence: what do growing families want? They want bigger houses and yards.
You can find more information at the link below:
brainly.com/question/3733575?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
to suggest and support an interpretation of literature
Explanation:
<em>to suggest and support an interpretation of literature</em> – <u>this is the correct answer. The literal analysis is careful reading and interpretation of the written piece.</u><u> The analysis should examine carefully characters, settings, atmosphere, imagery, and plot. </u>The full and scientific analysis should explore the meaning and the ideas behind the written piece, and use the literary theory that fits the work.
<em> to summarize a work of literature in great detail</em> – this is not the correct answer. Literary analysis is not just a summary of the piece.
<em />
<em> to evaluate how well a work of literature is written</em> – this is not the right answer. The analysis doesn’t grade up the quality of the piece.
<em />
<em> to suggest how a work of literature should be revised </em>– this is not the correct answer. Review or edit are the ones that suggest the revisions.
