Klemens Metternich can be considered a conservative statesman because He believed that strong monarchies would lead to social and political stability. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
a statesman?</h3>
Generally, one who knows the ins and outs of government a person who takes part in running the government or influencing its policies
In conclusion, As someone who thought that powerful monarchs would bring about social and political stability, Klemens Metternich is an example of a conservative statesman.
Read more about statesman
brainly.com/question/10308489
#SPJ1
Answer:
Puritans in North America
Puritans were Calvinists, so their churches were unadorned and plain. It is the oldest building in continuous ecclesiastical use in America and today serves a Unitarian Universalist congregation.
Answer:
Solids
Explanation:
In solids, molecules will move the slowest, especially since the particles are packed together
hope this helps and is right. p.s. i really need brainliest :)
Republican party is the oldest of the two largest U.S. political parties. Republican party of 1854 emerged to combat the expansioned of slavery into the American territories after the passing of the Knass-Nebraska Act.
Republican party was founded in 1854 and it is intrinsically connected. It is consisted of northern protestants, factory workers, businessmen, prosperous farmer, professional, and after the Civil War, former black slaves.
The main issues of this party in 1854 was the abolition of slavery and it is the main goal of that party. It is known to support right leaning ideologies of conservatism among others.
Learn more about Republican party click the link here:
brainly.com/question/342882
#SPJ4
The Civil War has been something of an enigma for scholars studying American history. During the first half of the twentieth century, historians viewed the war as a major turning point in American economic history. Charles Beard labeled it “Second American Revolution,” claiming that “at bottom the so-called Civil War – was a social war, ending in the unquestioned establishment of a new power in the government, making vast changes – in the course of industrial development, and in the constitution inherited from the Fathers” (Beard and Beard 1927: 53). By the time of the Second World War, Louis Hacker could sum up Beard’s position by simply stating that the war’s “striking achievement was the triumph of industrial capitalism” (Hacker 1940: 373). The “Beard-Hacker Thesis” had become the most widely accepted interpretation of the economic impact of the Civil War. Harold Faulkner devoted two chapters to a discussion of the causes and consequences of the war in his 1943 textbook American Economic History (which was then in its fifth edition), claiming that “its effects upon our industrial, financial, and commercial history were profound” (1943: 340).
