1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kobusy [5.1K]
3 years ago
6

PLEASE ONLY HAVE 5 MINUTES LEFT

History
1 answer:
OLEGan [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

last answer

Explanation:

quick google search does the trick

You might be interested in
How did the Great Society programs impact Americans?
DaniilM [7]

Answer:

It gave a better quality of life due to medicare and medicade

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the United States so interested in the security of Latin America?
inessss [21]
The main reason why the United States was so interested in the security of Latin America is because the Latin American countries were so close to the US, meaning that if they were invaded by European powers it would post a threat to the US. 
4 0
3 years ago
Central and state governments influence each other in
Julli [10]
The two governments, support each other in a federal system. The system is that in which the governmental power is divided between the central government and the territorial subdivisions. The federal government refers to the national government of the US.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help!!!!!!!!!
scoundrel [369]

Answer:

Please post a clear photo because it is blur

3 0
3 years ago
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • After the Revolutionary War, which branch of government did the states make more powerful? A. The state governments B. Their gov
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a description of a person who is involved in the production of a good?​
    10·2 answers
  • Look at the enormous limestone statue below. Known as the Great Sphinx of Giza, it was created in about 2500 BCE in Egypt. What
    6·1 answer
  • what physical features does Greece have that would have encouraged the Greeks to make their living from the sea?
    5·2 answers
  • The bill of rights checks and balances and separation of power are all examples of ways the constitution seeks to do which of th
    7·1 answer
  • who was known for putting herself in the line of fire when taking pitchers what is her atchual nameof water to the colonial army
    14·1 answer
  • What party formed to limit slavery in the west?
    9·2 answers
  • Multiple Choice Question Which of the following was NOT a characteristic of Athens's Golden Age? A Afunctioning democratic gover
    13·1 answer
  • Plzz help fast due 9 min /math
    11·1 answer
  • Identify the diffrence between an aria and an opera
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!