Answer:
More Republican than Democratic justices have been elected.
In general, more conservative than liberal justices have been elected.
Several tort reform laws were passed during the early 2000s that limited damages against defendants.
Answer:
To pay those of us with less money
Explanation:
Wealthy people hire people with less money than them to do things and when you have a job or do something for them they pay you in return. Imagine a very wealthy person owns a successful business, they can't clean they store, manage stocks(stonks), and do everything else by themselves and that's where the people who need money come in. They pay us to work for them and they still get money back from the business. That's what rich people are for to pay those of us who need money, making them a very essential part of the economy.
- They are considered gatekeepers because they make the initial decision of wether or not they think a crime has occurred, then they make they decision to report the act to the system if they think a law was broken.
-The Wickersham Report studies “the administration of justice”
Answer:
The major premise is lack of House to pay attention towards the road ahead of him and the rule of contributory negligence. By using this jurisdiction, the plaintiff's damages will be reduced.
Explanation:
- The defendant driver, while he may ultimately be liable if all of the witnesses say he ran the stop sign, will raise the comparative fault of House for failing to keep a proper lookout and failing to take evasive action to avoid a collision.
- The defenses are the same as they would be if the collision was with another car instead of a bicycle.
- House had an ordinary duty to pay attention to the road ahead of him and keep himself and others safe.
- By watching his books and not the traffic, he breached that duty.
- I'm not saying that defense will be successful, but that's what would be alleged by the car's driver as a defense.
- In most states, the damages to the plaintiff will be reduced by the percentage of his/her comparative fault (also known in some jurisdictions as contributory negligence).
- In some states, if the plaintiff's comparative fault is shown to be over 50%, there will be no recovery at all.
Answer:
No this was not the case for me and I was not aware that it was a good idea to have the opportunity to speak to the
