Not really,
It is reliant on the intensity of the attack as well as the power of the attacking nation.
some countries have been attacked and literally never fought back but surrendered if the attacking nation is more powerful in terms of military power.
in case the intensity of the attack can be absorbed, a country can also opt for diplomacy as war is the ultimate sanction in international relation.
in case the country feels it has the capacity to protect its sovereignty then fighting back is the only option.
The Mughals did not follow any law of succession like the law of primogeniture. Consequently, each time a ruler died, a war of succession between the brothers for the throne started. This weakened the Mughal Empire, especially after Aurangzeb. It is generally believed by the historians that one of the major causes of the decline of the Mughal empire was the policy of conflict followed by Aurangzeb with the Rajput’s.
<span>without them, the small States would have carried little weight in the new government</span>
The southern succession was the underlying fear because southern states said they would succeed from the union of Freemon became president
The correct answer is letter C<span>. Michael Faraday was the first to drill a commercially successful oil well in the US, is the false statement in the choices above. This man was a known English Scientist that have greatly contributed to the fields of electromagnetism and electrochemistry. He does not have anything to do with the oil well in the US.</span>