1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
UkoKoshka [18]
3 years ago
8

1. What is the main idea in High Incomes Don't Bring You Happiness"||

English
2 answers:
natima [27]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The main idea of the text is that money does not play an important role in the emotional well-being of people.

Explanation:

"High Incomes Don't Bring You Happiness" is an article written by Caitlin Kenney. The article is based on the answers of psychologist Daniel Kahneman and economist Angus Deaton, who provides an insight on how much money or high salary plays a role in making a person happy.

<u>According to the study, researchers have found that people's emotional well-being actually decreases when a person begins to earn more than $75,000 per annum. The researchers says that it is important to have a balance between emotional well-being and life evaluation, but when a person's income is equal or above $75,000 per annum, than their emotional well-being decreases. So, to be happy money is not a vital part but how we define happiness</u>.

So, the correct answer would be that money does not play a major role in emotional well-being of people.

Archy [21]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The main idea that the author Caitlin Kenney seems to address in this essay seems to be that even though money has no direct relationship with the level of happiness of a person, it has some influence, to a certain extent, of making the person believe that her life is much better than that of the ones poorer than her.

Explanation:

In the study of how incomes have any impact on the overall happiness of a person, Caitlin Kenney's "High Incomes Don't Bring You Happiness" delves into what it is that makes money an important factor of our lives and do they have any connection with how people feel about their lives.

Starting the essay with the question<em> "How much do you think it would take to make you happy?</em>" the author implores into the issue of how high-income groups seem to be relatively happier than the ones in the lower-income groups. Referencing to the study by psychologist Daniel Kahneman and economist Angus Deaton, the study further reveals how certain amounts of income seem to have a lighter effect on people. But overall, even though money has no direct connection with how happy a person is, there is still some effect it has, like influencing people to believe that the life they live is much better than the ones lived by the poorer people.

You might be interested in
During which time in the history of drama did Shakespeare write?
Oliga [24]
Shakespeare wrote in the time period of when England was expanding. Another way you could phrase it is during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I.
8 0
2 years ago
In "Of Plymouth Plantation," Bradford depicts the Plymouth colonists as___?
mafiozo [28]

In "Of Plymouth Plantation," Bradford depicts the Plymouth colonists as "industrious because they started the first railroad in America.." (Option C) In reality,

Though Plymouth's economy would never be as robust as that of succeeding colonies like as Massachusetts Bay Colony, agriculture, fishing, and commerce enabled the colony to become self-sufficient within five years of its founding.

Many more European settlers followed in the footsteps of the Pilgrims to New England.

<h3>Who are the Plymouth Colonist?</h3>

The Plymouth Colony New England's first colonial settlement (founded 1620).

A group of roughly 100 Puritan Separatist Pilgrims traveled on the Mayflower and settled in what is now Cape Cod Bay, Massachusetts. The first settlement was named after their port of departure.

Learn more about "Of Plymouth Plantation":
brainly.com/question/2757594
#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
ASAP SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME!!!
TiliK225 [7]
Elie Wiesel's literary work prompted one reviewer to recall Isaac Bashevis Singer's definition of Jews as "a people who can't sleep themselves and let nobody else sleep," and to predict, "While Elie Wiesel lives and writes, there will be no rest for the wicked, the uncaring or anyone else." [1<span>] If uneasiness is the result of Wiesel's work, it is not a totally unintended result. Since the publication of </span>Night<span> in 1958, Wiesel, a Jewish survivor of the Nazi death camps, has borne a persistent, excruciating literary witness to the Holocaust. His works of fiction and non-fiction, his speeches and stories have each had the same intent: to hold the conscience of Jew and non-Jew (and, he would say, even the conscience of God) in a relentless focus on the horror of the Holocaust and to make this, the worst of all evils, impossible to forget.</span>

Wiesel refuses to allow himself or his readers to forget the Holocaust because, as a survivor, he has assumed the role of messenger. It is his duty to witness as a "messenger of the dead among the living," [2] and to prevent the evil of the victims' destruction from being increased by being forgotten. But he does not continue to retell the tales of the dead only to make life miserable for the living, or even to insure that such an atrocity will not happen again. Rather, Elie Wiesel is motivated by a need to wrestle theologically with the Holocaust.

The grim reality of the annihilation of six million Jews presents a seemingly insurmountable obstacle to further theological thought: how is it possible to believe in God after what happened? The sum of Wiesel's work is a passionate effort to break through this barrier to new understanding and faith. It is to his credit that he is unwilling to retreat into easy atheism, just as he refuses to bury his head in the sand of optimistic faith. What Wiesel calls for is a fierce, defiant struggle with the Holocaust, and his work tackles a harder question: how is it possible not to believe in God after what happened? [3]

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WhichWhich sentence best uses the word "chatter" with the definition "to make speech-like sounds, as certain animals do"?
Ede4ka [16]

Answer:

Answer is C, I’m sure once they get their food, the monkeys will start to chatter

Explanation:

Just finished the test and got it right

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following additional text features would best support the main idea of this
Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

A heading to separate content about the modem and ancient worlds

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The evidence in a body paragraph<br>​
    9·1 answer
  • Which sentence contains an error in punctuation?
    7·2 answers
  • What is the issue most often cited by news media as the greatest problem facing journalism today?
    5·2 answers
  • Which comparisons of Julia and Cornelia are true Select the two options
    5·2 answers
  • Which of these excerpts from the poems you read is an example of personification?
    15·2 answers
  • Can someone please help out?
    6·1 answer
  • Help!! I need this quickly!
    5·2 answers
  • Read the sentence below and answer the question that follows. Ultimate Frisbee is a sport that is played in countries around the
    7·2 answers
  • I need help plzzzz!!!
    5·1 answer
  • " And so, we've come to cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!