1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex17521 [72]
3 years ago
13

How did the north population differ from the south's population?

History
2 answers:
lubasha [3.4K]3 years ago
8 0
Hello!

The North's population primarily consisted of white people. The north also had many abolitionists (people against slavery).
The South, however, was made up of white people and slaves. Most white people in the South agreed with the idea of slavery and promoted it. 

I hope this helps answer your question!
guapka [62]3 years ago
4 0

The North's population was much larger than the South's.

You might be interested in
What concerns did President Monroe have about other countries?​
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

He first reiterated the traditional U.S. policy of neutrality with regard to European wars and conflicts. He then declared that the United States would not accept the recolonization of any country by its former European master, though he also avowed non-interference with existing European colonies in the Americas. I hope this is helpful :)

5 0
2 years ago
Which words best describe king leopold ii’s actions in central africa?
serg [7]

Answer:

cruel, ruthless, genocidal

Explanation:

Leopold II, who reigned in Belgium between 1865 and 1909, sought to turn his small country into an imperial power for which he led efforts to develop the Congo River basin.

Arguing his desire to bring the benefits of Christianity, Western civilization and commerce to African natives, the monarch convinced the Eurasian powers to allow him to take control of that vast region through an organization he called the International African Association and that In 1885 he transformed into the Free State of Congo.

This private institution was not linked to the Belgian state but depended directly on the monarch, who presented himself as his "owner." It was the only private colony in the world.

But behind the philanthropic discourse of Leopold II there was a great interest in seizing the great wealth of the territory.

First, of ivory, which was immensely appreciated at the time.

Thus arose most of the wealth obtained by the monarch during the first years of the Free State of Congo.

Gradually, interest in ivory was displaced by rubber fever, when in the 1890s its use skyrocketed to produce bicycle and car wheels.

There are also many stories about the crudeness with which this material was exploited in the territories controlled by Leopold II.

He turned his 'Free State of the Congo' into a massive labor camp, made a fortune for himself by collecting rubber and contributed greatly to the death of perhaps 10 million innocents.

In 1998, the American historian Adam Hochschild published a book in which Leopold II was designated as responsible for a kind of African holocaust, which would exceed the number of dead Jews by Nazi Germany in number of victims.

What there is a coincidence among scholars was in the brutal methods used by the representatives of Leopold II to force the native population to exploit the rubber.

The method to force Congolese to work was as follows: they entered a village by force, took women and girls hostage and ordered men to enter the jungle to collect a certain quota of rubber.

While the men fulfilled the task imposed to save their wives and daughters, they starved or were subjected to sexual abuse.

In addition, those who were not able to complete the quota that had been imposed on them were threatened with the amputation of one of their hands or those of one of their children.

Is it enough to qualify Leopold II as a genocidal?

5 0
3 years ago
How did technology benefit one group over another
VashaNatasha [74]
Well do you mean like how one invention of the light bulb was made but then it help make a car?
6 0
2 years ago
Why is learning about other cultures and religions important for being a global citizen in the 21st century?
12345 [234]

Answer:

While the concept of global citizenship is not a new one, it is becoming ever more important in our expanding and increasingly interconnected world. ... <em><u>The ability to question one's own perspective on the world</u></em> and to practice tolerance and understanding for other cultures is vital for critical thinking.

4 0
2 years ago
The communist bloc was located between Russia and western filling what role?
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

The Warsaw Pact nations were buffer states between the USSR and Western Europe

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which African country's government sponsors death squads known as the the Janjawid, who kill and terrorie farmers in Darfur?
    15·1 answer
  • Which term best describes the study of the history of writing history
    11·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP i'm struggling
    13·1 answer
  • Support staff in the office of the president include
    7·2 answers
  • What inspired the Founding Fathers to write the Declaration of Independence?
    7·1 answer
  • In both European and Japanese feudalism, power was in the hands of
    13·2 answers
  • PLEASEEEEEE HELPPPPP
    14·2 answers
  • What did americans do in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries to improve the transportation of people and products
    5·1 answer
  • Who stressed that one must study history to understand the present?
    14·2 answers
  • What strategies should writers use to help organize their ideas for an informational essay?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!