In Simons and Chabris’s (1999) experiment, participants are focused on a challengingperceptual task, counting the white team’s basketball passes while ignoring the black team’s basketball passes. Because of the challenging nature of the task:
A. Inattentional blindness is more likely to occur
B. Attentional capture of irrelevant stimuli is more likely to occur
C. Attention shift capacity is less likely to occur
D. The spotlight model of attention is needed to explain the data
Answer:
A. Inattentional blindness is more likely to occur
Explanation:
Inattentional blindness often referred to as Perceptual blindness is a term in psychology which describes the failure of an individual or observer to notice or perceive a fully visible but unexpected object, due to the attention being given or channeled to another task at that moment.
This is a phenomenon that was first coined by Irvin Rock and Arien Mack, in 1992, both are psychologists.
The most common experiments demonstrating inattentional blindness is the "invisible gorilla test" carried out by Christopher Chabris, Ph.D. and Daniel Simons, Ph.D.
Answer:
the state’s interest in regulating the matter.
Explanation:
The law in the state of Arizona affects the interstate commercial activities around trucking and the court would seek avenues to make sure that the unfavorable impacts of the law on interstate commerce gets balanced off with the interest of the state in regulating the matter. The court will not try to balance off that burden on interstate against non-commercial activities in the area or the authority of the courts to ascertain if a law is constitutional or not.
All other options stated above are incorrect except option C
Answer:
The Declaration of Sentiments
Explanation:
The first one is that right
Answer: Judgement
Explanation:
Research or scholarship misconduct is defined as occurrence of error because of fabrication, alteration, plagiarism, forgery etc.It can take place while, performing research, recording the observation of research, reviewing or any other step.
Honest errors are not the part of research misconduct because they are expected to happen by any researching member by mistake. It is not included in research misconduct while making any judgement or explanation.
