1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MariettaO [177]
2 years ago
10

3. Without army pay, how did Tubman earn money to live?

History
2 answers:
zalisa [80]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Well she decided to Do more jobs.

Explanation: She became a nurse writer and activist and that is really how she lived, she earned money from doing those jobs.

Mandarinka [93]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Well she decided to Do more jobs.

Explanation: She became a nurse writer and activist and that is really how she lived, she earned money from doing those jobs.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Of the following, whose contribution was most significant to the emerging American identity? Charles Townshend, John Dickenson,
trapecia [35]

The correct answer is James Otis:

Otis was a lawyer and political activist. He was one of the first to express patriotic views and openly oppose British policies in the colonies. These ideas where the founding stone of the American Revolution.

He is known for the phrase "Taxation without Representation is tyranny", which became a common statement within the people who supported the revolution.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ill give brainly but please hurry
Trava [24]
Students the first one will give explanation in needed
4 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
NEED HELP ASAP BEEN STUCK ON THIS FOR AWHILE, PLZ HELP ME! IM SO CONFUSED!
Andrei [34K]

Explanation:

In simpler words, the multi-part question is asking for you to first analyze the three sources, then pick a side and have knowledge to defend your point on the question 'to what extent should nations pursue their national interests'.

In source 1, it shows that the majority of Canadians are opposed to sending troops to Afghanistan, with 36% voting for, 5% unsure, and 59% voting against.

Source two is clearly depicting the nazi's, at a rally held in Nuremberg. Although the source does not state if the protesters are pro or against Nazi regime, I am assuming they are pro. This would lead to the assumption that the people of Nuremberg are pro-Nazi empire.

The source 3 is a timeline, that goes from 1920 to 2005. This time period is very significant, because it captures many important battles, such as world war 2, Persian Gulf War, and the Iraq invasion.

After reading these three sources, you must decide if you think it is good for  nations to pursue their national interests, or bad.

Hope this long explanation helped clarify the troubling question for you!

8 0
2 years ago
Outline how the Hague Convention of 1954 influences tourism​
Kryger [21]

Answer:

1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. ... It is the first international treaty with a world-wide vocation focusing exclusively on the protection of cultural heritage in the event of armed conflictThe Second Protocol complemented the 1954 Hague Convention, and aimed ... they had already been approved by Cabinet, and outlined that, in general, ... industries, increasing awareness of UCH and its tourism potential.Second Protocol to the Hague Convention of 1954 for the Protection of Cultural. Property in the ... development and sustainable tourism, and they ... outlined the programme. ... What is BSA's responsibility for Australia and influence across

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
*~*DON'T ANSWER IF YOU DONT KNOWWWWW!!!!! *~*
KengaRu [80]
The correct answer here would be:

(We the People of the United States), in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

The popular sovereignty refers to the principle that the governments rule and derive their power from the consent of the people that are governed. In other words that the governments are of the people for the people. This passage reflects that idea as it is the people of the United States that established the constitution.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why do art historians and critics believe that modern art has ended?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following men was an outspoken critic in regards to the perceived tyranny of church and state?
    15·2 answers
  • What issues divided the country at the end of the Era of Good Feelings? (list 5)
    13·2 answers
  • A time when the good and bad aspects of a bill are discussed is a
    7·1 answer
  • What did Stephen Austin's Army of the People do after capturing Goliad?
    12·1 answer
  • _____1. If the House of Representatives passed a bill and then the Senate rejects the proposed bill, this illustrates which of t
    13·1 answer
  • What does historiography suggest<br> about history?
    7·1 answer
  • I need help with this can you help me. Please.
    11·2 answers
  • Hi guys ❤️❤️❤️(^o^)<br><br>Can you answer this for me? ​
    12·2 answers
  • Explain ONE example of an imperial state that gained territory through a treaty settlement after World War I.​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!