Because they had no influence over the budget and military.
In Hamilton's words that would be "no influence ever either the sword or the purse". He argued that because of this the judiciary would be the least threatening branch of the government and that it had to rely on both other branches to uphold its rulings and decisions. In Federalist No. 78 he also states what powers and responsibilities the judicial branch would have.
Federal, state, and local governments.
Some people consider the way the media covers candidates for public office bad for democracy due to the way they present the facts and evidence. e.g. Whenever Donald Trump was running for presidency they constantly reported on his sexual abuse accusations instead of his good deeds and samaritan actions. He helped in the recovery from the flood in Louisiana and sent food and shelter for the suffering families, but you never heard that on the news... They broadcast the information in a way that will attract the most viewers, not in a way that delivers the most factual and true information.
Answer:
this is in your text book
Explanation:
Answer:
It allowed humans to create permanent settlements with the hope of a stable food supply. When people learned about agriculture, they become able to know that they can also get their food without hunting or searching fruits here and there. Along with this, people understood that they could stay in one place with one another without having any tension of food. This thinking was the major turning point in the development of humans, their societies, and their settlements. I know agriculture allows us to easily get food now rather than having to hunt and gather it. It also allowed people to focus on things they wanted like religion, government, art, etc.
Hope this helps✌
