A tyrant would want to convince the people not to insist on democracy. He could use arguments such as:
Democracy will make the country weak and vulnerable to outside attacks
Democracy will not be an efficient form of government because people would argue too much
His rule is better because it provides stability
Answer:
Risky shift.
Explanation:
Risky shift is when a group or team agrees on a decision that would have been riskier for one individual to take alone. Such a group attitude would increase the chance for consequences that are not positive. In such a scenario people would change their decisions to be more riskier when they are in a group compared to when they are acting individually. It is a form of group polarization.
<span>It could be said that Jonathan Edwards who wrote the “Sinners in the
Hands of and Angry God” might actually have written about heaven. It might be
considered a modern caricature that tries to reduce his preaching to one
sermon. He may have felt that it was her mission as a pastor to raise people
affection to God as high as possible. </span>
Italy has attracted settlers for thousands of years because of many reasons, of course, but it's positioning as a prime spot in the Mediterranean Ocean was a major reason.
