Answer:
Reactance.
Explanation:
This is simply explained the juror's motives and doings which directly tells that inadmissible evidence violates due process, and legal evidentiary standards dictate that a curative instruction is appropriate to minimize the risk that the jury is misled by the unacceptable information.
Psychologists posit that jurors are likely to follow the prescribed corrective action only if motivated and able to do so. Research shows that jurors do attempt to use information in a fair manner and to align their decisions with the judge’s instructions. However, juror motivation also may be affected by reactance resistance to a judge’s admonition when it is seen as constraining effective deliberation unless the judge can offer a clear and compelling reason as to why the information is unreliable or irrelevant to the case. Jurors may resist giving up information that they find probative.
C) the Vietnam war
It was televised which is why it sparked so much controversy because people were finally seeing what was happening in the war
Answer:
stratosphere
Explanation:
because it contains ozone layer which protects us against ultraviolet sun rays
Answer:
b. credibility
Explanation:
Credibility is the quality that someone has when they can be believed in. In this case, Joe has a lot of credibility in the subject of steroid use because as a professional bodybuilder, he is part of an enviroment in which steroid use is rampant.
Listeners will assume that Joe most likely knows first-hand about what he is talking about, and this will add to his credibility.
Answer:
Amelia needs to make 87 on the final.
Explanation:
Let final test grade is x
amelia has taken total number of 5 tests before and the final exam is equivalent to 2 test therefore total test is 7 in number
Using the above formula:
560 = 386 + 2x
174 = 2x
87 = x
Amelia needs to make 87 on the final.
