Answer:
part A : A
Explanation:
Children have extensive background knowledge they draw on to form stereotypes.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Remark
What huck sees and how he interprets it is what this short comment is about. I would pick
<em>Despite his lack of formal upbringing, Huck has good intuition when it comes to reading situations.</em>
<em />
Yes, he exaggerates some, but the exaggeration does nothing to distort what he's looking at.
He doesn't always look for humor and sometimes he just plain wrong. I think it's Chapter 16 where Jim talks about the value of children and concludes that Solomon was not as wise as he was made out to be. Jim's insightful analysis is way above Huck's head and the passage is neither funny nor Jim's analysis exaggerated.
Its against someone elses belief
Answer:
Eric Klinenberg, assistant professor of sociology at New York University (formally of Northwestern University), wrote "Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago" in order to further investigate the devastating Chicago heat wave of 1995. From July 13h to July 20th, the heat led to over 700 deaths and thousands being hospitalized due to heat related illness. Following the catastrophe, there have been numerous medical, meteorological, and epidemiological studies done examining the reasons for the historic mortality rate, but none seemed to focus on the on underlying issues such as social etiology. In "Heat Wave", Klinenberg, a Chicago native, takes his fascination with the social possibilities surrounding the event to greater depths.…show more content…
Here, the key health and support services of the governmental organization, the police and fire departments, include officers who are rarely committed to "soft service" work. And lastly, in chapter 5 "The Spectacular City," Klinenberg speaks about media's involvement during that time. He investigates and interviews journalists, editors, and news companies, discussing the angles at which the disaster was portrayed and why this may be. More importantly, this chapter focuses on the cultural "reframing" of the actually news and information of the heat wave. He says that Chicago used its public relations tools to deny there was a disaster and then to claim it was a natural and unpreventable one. They defended the government's role while masking the social roots of the high mortality rates during the heat wave. I originally chose this book because the brief summary given to us in class had caused me to become more interested Klinenberg's findings throughout his extensive research. This book proved to correlate directly with many of the ideas we discussed in class.
Explanation:
