I think because since the kingdom was so spread out the kingdom could have weak points and sometimes wont be defended since its so spread out im not sure but i think thats it hope it helped
Answer: A) High income intake versus debt
Explanation: Having a high income to debt ratio is actually good for an economy, boosting the GDP and ensuring a debt crisis doesn't occur. The Soviet Union, however had the opposite, with a high debt to income ratio.
The Mongols treated the non-muslim subjects most fairly, while the Ottomans treated them the least fairly.
The Mongols were religiously tolerant because they conquered and rule through manpower rather than religion. The Ottomans were the least fair to non-muslims. It is close between the Umayyads and the Ottomans, but the only difference is the amount of discrimination (per se) held against non-muslims. While the Umayyads only had the jizya (tax paid if you were non-muslim), the Ottomans had distinctive restrictions on non-muslims. They had dress codes according to their religion and could only reside in neighborhoods who's residents were of the same religion (under the Ottomans).
3rd Parties do not have a lot of members, do not have huge rallies, are not very "out there", are not filmed by the media often, are not often publized. One example is the Green Party which is a liberal party.
George Wallace of the American Independent Party won at least one state.
Martin Van Buren in 1848 is a good example f someone who was popular but won 0 elector votes
Causes of the War of 1812. At the outset of the 19th century, Great Britain was locked in a long and bitter conflict with Napoleon Bonaparte's France. ... In 1809, the U.S.<span> Congress repealed Thomas Jefferson's unpopular Embargo Act, which by restricting trade had hurt </span>Americans<span> more than either Britain or France.</span>