1867 if thats one of your answers
Answer:
1- <u>McCulloch v. Maryland</u>:
-The Second Bank of the United States was involved in the case
.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not tax a federal institution
2- <u>Gibbons v. Ogden</u>:
-The state of New York was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not regulate commercial activities between states
.
-A state granted one company exclusive rights over the Hudson river
.
Explanation:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland was a case resolved by the Supreme Court in 1819, whereby the state of Maryland was prohibited from imposing a tax on federal banks operating in its territory. Thus, the concept of federalism prevailed over the rights of the states, while guaranteeing the operability of the Constitutional "Necessary and Proper Clause", which authorizes Congress to carry out certain acts not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, but that tend to comply with such authorized activities.
2- Gibbons v. Ogden was a ruling of the Supreme Court in 1824, which confirmed that the power to regulate commerce between states belonged to the federal government. This is due to a conflict between New York and New Jersey, which in principle was to be resolved by local courts, thus violating the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the right to equality between the states.
<span>A Viceroy in the Spanish colonies watched over the king's land, increased his wealth, and carried out anything that the King wanted to be done. Therefore the answer is A.</span>
