Answer:
False
Explanation:
The U.S. did not use Kamikazes. Kamikazes were a part of the Japanese military strategy.
The appointment and confirmation of Justices to the Supreme Court of the United States involves several steps set forth by the United States Constitution, which have been further refined and developed by decades of tradition. Candidates are nominated by the President of the United States and must face a series of hearings in which both the nominee and other witnesses make statements and answer questions before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which can vote to send the nomination to the full United States Senate.[1] Confirmation by the Senate allows the President to formally appoint the candidate to the court.[1] The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a Justice, thus the President may nominate any individual to serve on the Court.
Senate cloture rules historically required a two-thirds affirmative vote to advance nominations to a vote; this was changed to a three-fifths supermajority in 1975. In November 2013, the then-Democratic Senate majority eliminated the filibuster for executive branch nominees and judicial nominees except for Supreme Court nominees by invoking the so-called nuclear option. In April 2017, the Republican Senate majority applied the nuclear option to Supreme Court nominations as well,[2] enabling the nominations of Trump nominees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to proceed to a vote.....
Hope this helps ;)
Gitlow v. New York (freedom of speech)
Gideon v. Wainwright (right to a lawyer)
Explanation: Gitlow v. New York (freedom of speech) it was a decision of the United States Supreme Court, stating that the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution was stipulated as a First Amendment Revision protecting freedom of expression and freedom of the press to apply in the US states.
Gideon v. Wainwright (right to a lawyer) this is a case of the United States Supreme Court. In it, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that states are required, under the Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution, to provide a lawyer to defendants in criminal cases that cannot afford their own lawyers.
Answer:
The advantage that French-American colonists had over the British-American Colonists was that French-Americans worked in unified manner, they had one Direction, on Council, and one Purse, whereas, British-American colonies were disunited.
Explanation:
The French and Indian War began in 1754 over the dispute of having territorial gain of the heart of North America, that is Ohio River Valley. Ohio River Valley was the center of trade and settlements. But the issue was under which colony does this area come, French colonies or American Colonies.
During the War, the French-American colonists had upper-hand over the British-American Colonists in a way that they were unified. The French-American colonists fought under '<em>one Direction, one Council, and one Pulse.' </em>Whereas, the colonies of British-America were unconnected and disunited. This disunity among the colonies was portrayed by Benjamin Franklin in his cartoon 'Join or die' which predicted that if British-American colonies will not fight in unity there will be much loss.
I am not going to write the complete essay but I will give you a clear and simple explanation :)
So, when looking at the United Nations we know that they were very mad and furious at Germany and Germany's allies for WWI. Due to this, it gave many harsh and cruel punishments which left many countries regretting this decision. This decision angered Germany and it turned against the whole world, which brings up Hitler. He was so mad that they lost the war that he decided to start WWII in order to try and get even with everyone else.
Hope This Helped!
