Answer:
A. Even though we each found a different piece of evidence to
support our conclusion, we can agree that Shakespeare was an
anti-imperialist.
Explanation:
This would aknowledge the fact that everyone found different solutions, yet they all fit into a single conclusion.
The paraphrasing mistake that Ania makes is a. She does not restate the ideas in her own words.
<h3>What is paraphrasing?</h3>
Paraphrasing connotes the restatement of a text or passage using different words from the author's.
While the meaning or idea of the paraphrased passage should be retained, the paraphrased expression should employ different words.
<h3>What are some paraphrasing mistakes?</h3>
Some of the paraphrasing mistakes that some writers make include:
- Rearranging the word order
- Changing the verb tenses
- Using synonyms to replace some words
- Using passive voices instead of active voices
- Failure to acknowledge the source of the original text.
Thus, the paraphrasing mistake that Ania makes is a. She does not restate the ideas in her own words.
Learn more about paraphrasing and paraphrasing mistakes at brainly.com/question/5032491 and brainly.com/question/27922122
#SPJ1
1. He agreed to abdicate and retire in favor of the next in line for the throne
2. My sister always treated me like I was a blight on the family name.
3. He was blithe about the risks to his health.
4. He led an ephemeral electronic existence.
5. Their fervid attacks on image worship led
to their expulsion.
6. I refuse to use the fetid public bathroom
that looks and smells as though it has not been cleaned in months.
7. A small Colombian flag was neatly tucked in his open mouth.
8. He had much taste and love for music, and considerable gifts as an orator of a florid type.
9. She picked the flower up and poked it over her left ear.
10. People who are nice and gullible are always taken advantage of.
11. irascible doctor who is offended by his presence beats him to within an inch of his life.
12. He feared the ignominy of being exposed as a spy.
13. She kept on lamenting and crying, continued the woman.
14. He shows a monastic dedication to his job.
15. The shares were sold for well below their nominal value.
16. Because she is a chef, she notices every nuance of flavor in the meal.
17. The beginnings of his doctrine of cellular pathology date from the earliest period in his career.
18. It is a defence against sedition and socialism.
19. This argument is rather specious than sound.
20. They were once looked down upon as the tawdry poor relations of the fashion industry.
Your answer is B., because it is unidentifiable, so if they don't know the source, then why cite it right? :P :D So anyways, that's why your answer is B. =)
I hope I helped! =D
This is exactly like comparing a book to a movie - Except there is no visual stimulation with the sound.
I also can't help much - Considering I do not pursue the text. Try to find examples based on my explanation.
Listening to sound reading always affects the way you interpreted the scene during the silent reading - Mostly because there is stimulation of how you are SUPPOSED to feel during this exact moment. The intensity in the narrator's voice, each sound they make, it stimulates your imagination. A sound can make you think differently of a certain point in the text after you read it. Sometimes, the words may sound better when pronounced, too.
Even though, reading may help you perfect your writing, considering you will know how to write words better after seeing them. Writing takes years to perfect, and so does grammar, but by reading you can make it even better than before.
Not only that, but your imagination and interpretation during reading are always your way, and they will change if you listen to it.
I hope I helped! Kudos.
