1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sertanlavr [38]
3 years ago
12

Who helped the colonists in the French and Indian War?

History
2 answers:
Nastasia [14]3 years ago
8 0
The British and France went to war the Indians helped out.
svetlana [45]3 years ago
8 0

<em>Answer:</em>

Hello There. Who helped the colonists In the French and Indian War? It was The British colonists were supported at various times by the Iroquois, Catawba, and Cherokee tribes, and the French colonists were supported by Wabanaki Confederacy member tribes Like Abenaki and Mi'kmaq, and the Algonquin, Lenape, Ojibwa, Ottawa, Shawnee, and Wyandot tribes.

Hope It Helps!

.ω. ItsNobody .ω.

You might be interested in
Did the expansion of the federal government from 1825-1836 weaken or strengthen the United states of America
fgiga [73]

Answer:

Without a doubt the expansion strengthens the United States. Greatest occasion in the development of the federal government was the Common War, which set up its in-comparability over the states. The Common War carried a lot of new capacity to the central government, and laid the basis for the development of interest groups.

Explanation:

The primary significant occasion in the development of the federal government was the endorsement of the Constitution in 1789. Before that, the US was administered under the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution is habitually commended as an archive that secures the privileges of people and restricts the forces of government. In any case, an examination of the Constitution with the Articles uncovers that the polar opposite is valid. Under the Constitution the government acquired force, was less responsible, and had more noteworthy scope to decide its own extent of activity. That is the thing that the Constitution was planned to achieve.

The Constitution set up the Constituent School for the choice of presidents, however indicated no technique for picking balloters. A few strategies were utilized, however in many states the lawmaking bodies picked them. The composers expected that in many races no up-and-comer would get a lion's share of discretionary votes. That would allow the Place of Delegates to name the president from the five top discretionary vote getters. That framework never filled in as imagined, and by 1828, with the appointment of Andrew Jackson, the current arrangement of famous deciding in favor of balloters had gotten immovably settled in, and alongside it the gathering framework. From that point on, fruitful applicants owed their prosperity to the help of their gatherings, and consequently utilized the political framework to remunerate the individuals who assisted them with getting chosen.

3 0
3 years ago
What is NOT a purpose or goal of the constitution?
Fittoniya [83]

Answer:

I'm pretty sure it's b sorry if I get it wrong

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain how the 5th and 14th Amendments help to guarantee "due process of law.
ki77a [65]
<span>Both the 5th Amendment and the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution provide all citizens with equal protection of their right to life, liberty and property.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Arizona, New Mexico, and Nevada must honor the Indian Reservation treaties drawn up by the government for the Indian Nations.
pychu [463]
This statement is true. Arizona, New Mexico and Nevada must honor the Indian Reservation treaties drawn upon by the government for the Indian Nations. These agreements must be honored by the people and the government of Arizona, New Mexico and Nevada in order to maintain a smooth-sailing relationship with the countries and states involved in these treatises. The Indian Nations in these treatises are given the rightful protection and freedom from unnecessary possible oppression that may happen to their land, people and properties for that matter.
8 0
3 years ago
Federal courts have the right to do which of the following to laws that they feel are violating the Constitution? debate impeach
Luden [163]

Federal courts have the right to nullify laws that they feel are violating the Constitution. These cases then often head to the higher court and possibly eventually to the Supreme Court if they are appealed far enough.

Explanation:

After examining them, they may nullify them if they assume the laws are undemocratic. Of course, there can be a discussion among the members of a court over whether a given law is unconstitutional. after reviewing them, they may revoke them if they feel the laws are illegal. Of course, there can be debate among the members of a court over whether a given law is undemocratic.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which two influences helped shaped the Byzantine Culture?
    10·1 answer
  • A history question is attached below:
    12·2 answers
  • Whose face is on the screen on the slide with the 13th Amendment?
    10·1 answer
  • Why was the Monroe Doctrine written?
    15·2 answers
  • How did the war of 1812 and free enterprise affect the u.s. economy
    14·1 answer
  • 4. Be able to identify the differences between medieval, Italian, and Northern Renaissance art.​
    5·1 answer
  • one way the “new immigrants” of the late 1800s differed from the “old immigrants” of the early 1800s was that the “new immigrant
    15·2 answers
  • According to this information (keeping in mind that in 1824 a candidate had to win 131 electoral votes in order to win the elect
    14·1 answer
  • Based on the information in the chart and the article, which philosopher MOST agreed with self-government?
    15·1 answer
  • True or false history questions plss
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!