The answer is the option C. <span>Two large canal systems linked Eastern manufacturers with the Northwest Territory.
That sentence contains a fact that is based on the object or objects not the subject that tells the sentence. The same facts can be proven by any subject. This is the information given is not based on the subject opinion buth onthe the very objects. That is whan an objective sentence means.
On the other hand the other sentences contains information that dependes on the subject that tells the sentence. needed (based on what or who? ), amazing, beautiful. Those are opinions which can vary depending onthe subject that tells the opinion; that is what subjective is.</span>
The correct answer is: "One of the results of the Schenck decision was that it removed protections for speech intended to cause panic or harm".
The Schenck decision was a landmark decision enacted by the US Supreme Court during WWI, in 1917, and related to the Espionage Act.
Two men had been handing out fliers trying to encourage people to resist the draft. They claimed that their viewpoint should be protected by the freedom of speech right included in the First Amendment to the US Constitution.
Meanwhile, the Espionage Act had been enacted aiming to block any interference with military operations or recruitment. According to this piece of legislation, obstructing the draft is considered a criminal offense because it poses a "clear and present danger", which is the condition that needs to be fulfilld in order to qualify as one of the very exceptional cases in which the rights provided by the First Amendment can be limited.
By setting laws or rule of law that everyone had to follow - keeping ready is a most thing. Sp<span>ies played an important part and the people surrounding the nation and the guards.
</span><span>Hammurabi also made a set of laws (which was one of the very first forms of written laws & helped control these large empires too.)</span>
<span>Delivering water to dry areas for growing crops</span>