1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lelechka [254]
3 years ago
10

President Reagan’s speech at the Brandenburg gate commonlit

History
1 answer:
Shtirlitz [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: here you go:

Explanation:

We come to Berlin, we American Presidents, because it's our duty to speak, in this place, of freedom. But I must confess, we're drawn here by other things as well: by the feeling of history in this city, more than 500 years older than our own nation; by the beauty of the Grunewald and the Tiergarten; most of all, by your courage and determination. Perhaps the composer, Paul Lincke, understood something about American Presidents. You see, like so many Presidents before me, I come here today because wherever I go, whatever I do: "Ich hab noch einen koffer in Berlin." [I still have a suitcase in Berlin.]

Our gathering today is being broadcast throughout Western Europe and North America. I understand that it is being seen and heard as well in the East. To those listening throughout Eastern Europe, I extend my warmest greetings and the good will of the American people. To those listening in East Berlin, a special word: Although I cannot be with you, I address my remarks to you just as surely as to those standing here before me. For I join you, as I join your fellow countrymen in the West, in this firm, this unalterable belief: Es gibt nur ein Berlin. [There is only one Berlin.]

...

And now the Soviets themselves may, in a limited way, be coming to understand the importance of freedom. We hear much from Moscow about a new policy of reform and openness. Some political prisoners have been released. Certain foreign news broadcasts are no longer being jammed. Some economic enterprises have been permitted to operate with greater freedom from state control. Are these the beginnings of profound changes in the Soviet state? Or are they token gestures, intended to raise false hopes in the West, or to strengthen the Soviet system without changing it? We welcome change and openness; for we believe that freedom and security go together, that the advance of human liberty can only strengthen the cause of world peace.

There is one sign the Soviets can make that would be unmistakable, that would advance dramatically the cause of freedom and peace. General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!

...

As I looked out a moment ago from the Reichstag, that embodiment of German unity, I noticed words crudely spray-painted upon the wall, perhaps by a young Berliner, "This wall will fall. Beliefs become reality." Yes, across Europe, this wall will fall. For it cannot withstand faith; it cannot withstand truth. The wall cannot withstand freedom.

You might be interested in
‘The most important factor in explaining witch hunts in the years c1500 – c1700 was religion’.
Flura [38]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which opera was written to celebrate the opening of the Suez Canal?
stepan [7]
D Aida is the answer I think if it ant I am sry if it is the answer u r welcome
5 0
3 years ago
Members of Congress signed the "Southern Manifesto" to ______.
3241004551 [841]
<span>The Declaration of Constitutional Principles (recognized unceremoniously as the Southern Manifesto) was a text written in February and March 1956, in the United States Congress, in disagreement to ethnic incorporation of public places. The Congressmen just made a draft of the text to stand the milestone Supreme Court 1954 presiding Brown v. Board of Education, which resolute that separation of public schools was unconstitutional. So the answer B.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
which two sentences explain why the Delhi sultanate did not convert the majority of indians to islam?
VARVARA [1.3K]
Well I can't see the possible sentences, but muslims were a minority in India at the time and the population was predominantly Hindu. Forcing the majority of the population to change their religion forcibly (and through that many of their core values, beliefs, traditions and practices) was a quick way to create political unrest which could lead to a revolution. They we're already a minority ruling a large and powerful nation, so they were already dealing with a lot of resistance from the population as it was. Maybe they wanted to practice tolerance for moral reasons, but more likely they just didn't want to push their luck when they were already struggling to remain popular.
3 0
3 years ago
Check
Akimi4 [234]

Answer:

Answer is D

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • BRAINLIESTTT ASAP!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • How did English ideas about government and the economy influence life in the 13 colonies
    7·1 answer
  • What case did George W. Bush make for invading Iraq as part of the War on Terror?
    12·1 answer
  • Why was the Soviet victory at Stalingrad a turning point in the war? Check all that apply.
    8·1 answer
  • In which country is buddhism widely practiced (one of their main religions)
    15·2 answers
  • What was the overall impact of the Doolittle Raid?
    6·1 answer
  • One of the "limited" wars fought by the United States was the War.
    6·1 answer
  • What other two religions that fell into the same category of Islam mention in the video?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did American isolation grow after WWI? <br> answer fast pls!!!
    8·1 answer
  • What is a reason why african american migration increased from the north to the south in the 1990s?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!