1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
amm1812
3 years ago
12

Why were leaders like Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin able to come into power?

History
1 answer:
galben [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

At the end of World War I, Europe was in complete chaos. Many were discontent, many were in financial distress, and many grew more angry at what "democracy" had come to. The German people were hit hard by the terms of the Treaty of Versailles. Many were impoverished, and blamed western countries for their demise. Hitler saw an opportunity to speak to the masses. He offered a strong, authoritarian style that many came to crave. Democracy under the Weimar Republic had brought the people to their knees, so Hitler was a solution to the "weakness" and "fragility" of democracy.  Mussolini also had a similar experience- he was able to offer Italians a strong, no-nonsense government. It should be noted that Mussolini and Hitler were fascists. They did not support communism- in fact, they said communism and socialism were their sworn enemies!

Stalin and the Soviet Union is more unique. Stalin didn't rise to power like Hitler and Mussolini- he was already running a totalitarian government.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The statement below is from a U.S. Supreme Court decision.
skad [1K]
The answer is Habeas Corpus
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Name the late-nineteenth-century aviator who made some 2,000 glider flights and inspired other aviators around the world.
Mrrafil [7]
The answer is Otto lilienthal
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help me I'll give you brainliest!!!!!
Bess [88]

Answer:

The Plague of Fear

Explanation:

The McCarthy's Communist hunts were part of the period called the Red Scare this was a time of prejudice and fear among the people of the United States of America saying the Communism was going to sweep the nation taking away their freedom and Democracy. McCarthy's hunts were done to "help make sure that communism is dealt with". McCarthy at the time held great power being in the Senate and held many unconstitutional trails to suspected Communist supporters/ spies for the "Communist Nation"/ Russia. And now we know that these acts we unjustified. Right after 9/11 we now come to repeat these actions acting on fear instead of justice. The Patriot Act, enacted after 9/11 allowed US agencies to search homes and initiate investigations without a warrant similar to the trials and investigations held during the Red Scare. After 9/11 we targeted and blamed Al-Qaeda and therefore initiated the War on Terrorism and invaded Afghanistan, but not to put down the organization that struck the United States instead they attack the Taliban. This war would continue even to this day fighting multiple organizations throughout the Middle East. This also became soon a fight less about 9/11 and more about fossil fuels and even today the US uses this as an excuse to continue and fight this war. So in the end America ends up only hurting itself in these situations violating our rights to protect our rights. The only real difference between these eras is the fact that we didn't use guns and bombs to get our way in the Red Scare that's why it's called a Cold War.

6 0
3 years ago
Someone know the Second Sino-Japanese War?
stellarik [79]

Answer:

The Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945) was a military conflict that was primarily waged  

between the Republic of China and the Empire of Japan. The war made up the Chinese theater  

of the wider Pacific Theater of the Second World War. The beginning of the war is  

conventionally dated to the Marco Polo Bridge Incident on 7 July 1937, when a dispute  

between Japanese and Chinese troops in Peking escalated into a full-scale invasion. This  

full-scale war between the Chinese and the Empire of Japan is often regarded as the  

beginning of World War II in Asia. In 2017 the Ministry of Education in the People's  

Republic of China decreed that the term "eight-year war" in all textbooks should be  

replaced by "fourteen-year war", with a revised starting date of 18 September 1931 provided  

by the Japanese invasion of Manchuria. According to historian Rana Mitter, historians in  

China are unhappy with the blanket revision, and (despite sustained tensions) the Republic  

of China did not consider itself to be continuously at war with Japan over these six years.  

The Tanggu Truce of 1933 officially ended the earlier hostilities in Manchuria while the  

He-Umezu Agreement of 1935 acknowledged the Japanese demands to put an end to all anti-  

Japanese organizations in China.

The war was the result of a decades-long Japanese imperialist policy to expand its  

influence politically and militarily in order to secure access to raw material reserves,  

food, and labor. The period after World War I brought about increasing stress on the  

Japanese policy. Leftists sought universal suffrage and greater rights for workers[citation  

needed]. Increasing textile production from Chinese mills was adversely affecting Japanese  

production and the Great Depression brought about a large slowdown in exports. All of this  

contributed to militant nationalism, culminating in the rise to power of a militarist  

faction. This faction was led at its height by the Hideki Tojo cabinet of the Imperial Rule  

Assistance Association under edict from Emperor Hirohito. In 1931, the Mukden Incident  

helped spark the Japanese invasion of Manchuria. The Chinese were defeated and Japan  

created a new puppet state, Manchukuo; many historians cite 1931 as the beginning of the  

war. This view has been adopted by the PRC government. From 1931 to 1937, China and Japan  

continued to skirmish in small, localized engagements, so-called "incidents".

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
A school board decides to have students wear uniforms. Who will be affected by the new policy?
ohaa [14]

Answer:c

Explanation: if it they put out the new rule to wear uniforms then the parents have to pay for new clothes and students have to stop wearing the clothes they are use to and wear uniforms

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which phrase best describes the term segregation?
    13·1 answer
  • how does clay compare and contrast the federalists during the former war and the whigs during the latter one
    13·1 answer
  • In what ways can we understand how civilizations developed?
    8·1 answer
  • What alteration could of been made to positively affect the outcome of the Reconstruction Era ?
    14·1 answer
  • The period from 1833���1901 in european history is called
    5·1 answer
  • What two countries had<br> differences during the Cold War?
    10·2 answers
  • List 3 ways the agricultural revolution caused the beginning of the industrial revolution
    11·1 answer
  • What is the difference between craft workers and common laborers
    8·1 answer
  • 12. Which of the following is not a Patriot?
    10·1 answer
  • Marks
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!