According to the War Powers Act, the President is required to inform Congress of any military operations he plans to take within 48 hours. If the United States is attacked or seriously threatened, the President may use military action abroad with the approval of Congress and under the authority of the War Powers Act. If the President fails to inform Congress within 48 hours and get permission, the decision might be challenged and overturned. In my capacity as a judge, I must inquire of the President as to why he chose not to inform Congress of his decision.
Good questions to ask are
- How strict is the standard of review on appeal, and what does it indicate for the scope of this court's review?
- Where do you excel the most? When there are two or more viable bases for a ruling, which one do you hope the court will choose, and why?
- What specific remedy are you seeking, and on what basis does the court have the power to award it?
<h3>What is oral arguments?</h3>
Generally, In a court of law, a case may be presented via oral argument.
In conclusion, For this case congress is correct.
Read more about oral arguments
brainly.com/question/15266611
#SPJ1
Answer:
is this like a story or something because I dont
see Marx's explanation or anything.. sorry i couldnt answer
Among the executive branch is checks on the legislative branch is the president‘s power to veto any legislation passed by the legislative branch. The president has two types of veto he can use. One is veto, which vetoes the whole legislation, which would then have a re-vote by the legislative branch. The other is line-item veto, in which the president vetoes parts of the bill, but not the whole thing.
~
<span>Reconstruction encompassed three major initiatives: restoration of the Union, transformation of southern society, and enactment of progressive legislation favoring the rights of freed slaves. </span><span>The Constitution provided no guidance on secession or readmission of states.</span>
