Answer:
C) two-way immersion
Explanation:
Important feature of the situation given above is that some students are Spanish and some English native speakers. Unlike the situations where majority of students is native in one language, and where the best approach would be one-way immersion, here, the best instructional approach would be two-way immersion. In this approach, two groups of students serve as both, the language model for their native language, and learners of the other language.
I believe it’s answer A because the rest don’t seem that right.
Answer:
Dear sister,
Go watch tv. It is much better then school because that causes stress. Not only do you have to listen to lessons you'll never need in life but you have to deal with lots of drama and fake people so go watch tv and be a happy little heathen!
Explanation:
which sentence part includes the subject and main action? = I bought the materials I needed.
which sentence part tells when the action takes place? = Over the next week
which sentence part tells why the action is done? = so that I could put my plan into action.
#hope this helps
Answer:
The sentence that has an error in subject-verb agreement is:
His discoveries was a combination of luck and hard work.
Explanation:
When we say a subject and a verb have to agree, we mean the verb must be inflected in accordance to the subject. If the subject is singular, the verb must also be singular. If the subject is plural, the verb is also plural. The verb "to be", especially, is quite an irregular verb, and requires due attention.
Having that in mind, we can say the sentence that contains an error is "His discoveries was a combination of luck and hard work." The noun "discoveries" is the main word of the subject, and it is plural. However, the verb "was" (past form of the verb "to be") can only be used for singular subjects. For the sentence to be correct, it should be:
His discoveries were a combination of luck and hard work.
