Answer:
Resented American control of the Economy ( A )
Explanation:
The Spanish American war was between America and Spain in 1898 in Cuba. this war was part of Cuba's war of independence from the Spanish colonial masters. the United states of America joined the war when there was an internal explosion of the USS Maine in Havana harbor in Cuba territory. this explosion provoked the American Government and also coupled with the struggle for independence been made by the Cubans American decided to help them fight the Spanish.
This war will lead to America acquiring lands/territories in Latin America and western pacific. the ultimate result of the war was the end of the colonial rule by the Spanish in Cuba.
America took control of the Economy of Cuba after helping Cuba gain freedom from the Spanish colonial rule. the workers in Cuba resented this control bitterly.
Answer:
Sumerian writing is called cuneiform.
Answer:
Hello,
It was the Franklin Roosevelt's "Good Neighbor Policy'
Explanation:
The Good Neighbor Policy was a foreign policy implemented in the United States by President Franklin Roosevelt with the aim of showing that the U.S were good neighbors with Latin American Countries. The doctrine was signed to improve relationship of the U.S with its neighboring Latin American countries. During the world war II most Latin American countries were on the side of the Allies as an influence of the policy.
Best of Luck!
Answer:
I hope it helps u.
Explanation:
Arms races have generated a great deal of interest for a variety of reasons. They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security, but agreement stops there. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations. The opposing view holds that engaging in an arms race is often a state's best option for avoiding war when faced with an aggressive adversary. Debate over the causes of arms races is just as divided. One school believes that arms races are primarily rational responses to external threats and opportunities, whereas arms race skeptics believe that arms buildups are usually the product of a mixture of internal, domestic interests, including those of the scientists involved in research and development (R&D), the major producers of weapons systems, and the military services that will operate them. The policy implications of these contending views are equally contradictory; critics see arms control as a way to reduce the probability of war and rein in domestic interests that are distorting the state's security policy, and proponents argue that military competition is most likely to protect the state's international interests and preserve peace.
Arms buildups and arms races also play a prominent role in international relations (IR) theory. Building up arms is one of a state's three basic options for acquiring the military capabilities it requires to achieve its international goals; the other two are gaining allies and cooperating with its adversary to reduce threats. In broad terms, choosing between more competitive and more cooperative combinations of these options is among the most basic decisions a state must make, and it is often the most important.
Mark me as brainlist answer,
Have a nice day,
Thank you ☺
