===========================================
<u>If</u><u> </u><u>you</u><u> </u><u>want</u><u> </u><u>to</u><u> </u><u>talk</u><u> </u><u>to</u><u> </u><u>anyone</u><u> </u><u>please</u><u> </u><u>don't</u><u> </u><u>ask</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u> </u><u>nonsense</u><u> </u><u>question</u><u> </u>
<u>
</u>
I've read Romeo and Juliet many times, and I can't agree with your question as to "Why does Shakespeare construct Juliet's lines so that she never directly lies" There are several times where she led others to believe something other than the truth-- she led her father to believe she was going to the confessional for her rebellion, when she was truly going to marry Romeo. She also finally acts as though she has succumbed to her father and will marry Paris.
That being said: I said "led on to believe" which is our day and age is considered lying/dishonesty. However when Shakespeare wrote this in 1597, things were much different than the are today. <span></span><span>Why does Shakespeare construct Juliet`s lines so that she never directly lies? A potienal </span><span>answer could be: <span><em>Shakespeare wanted the character of Juliet to remain innocently caught up in between the</em><em> </em><em>fued of </em>the </span></span><em>Montague and </em><span><em>Capulet</em></span><em>. If she had </em><em>out right</em><em> lied, her fragile, innocent </em><em>perseption</em><em> could be seen more as deception and connivery. </em>
The synonym for <em>redress</em> given from that selection would be rectify
Shakespeare in the play Romeo and Juliet, includes this comic speech by Mercutio in order to illustrate the close friendship between the men.
Mercutio accuses his fellow Montague Benvolio of not picking up fights and being hypocrite suggesting pair to go inside to avoid the fight. Mercutio is neither totally Montagues nor Capulet. Due to his close friendship with Benvolio and Romeo, he is considered to be Montagues and he is the cousin of the prince. To not let Benvolio deter him, in this scene he picks up the fight with the Capulets. Through his tone of quarrel, it is clear that his attitude is none-too-serious, taking it as a joke. His fight in the above passage is clearly ridiculous and non-sensical. Through this, mirrors the fight between Capulets and Montagues is equally baseless and unnecessary. Here, they fight because they have fought and they are 'quarrelsome' like Benvolio.
Marlow's job was to help promote imperialism, however, when he discovers that cannibals are not inhumane, he begins to see that imperialism is not a necessary measure and this makes him conflict with what he believed.
Although you haven't shown it, we can see that this question refers to "Heart of Darkness."
Based on this, we can obtain the following information:
- Marlow is the protagonist of the story.
- He is a sailor and works to promote European imperialism in regions around the world.
- He was taught that imperialism was a good thing that promoted order and civility in regions full of violence, cannibalism, people who didn't even look human.
- However, when he arrived in these regions he realized that the imperialist concepts were incorrect.
- The "cannibals," as they were called, were human and did not look like the portrait created of them by the imperialists.
In this case, he came into conflict with his thoughts and realized that his work was established as an abuse of foreign people and not as something good, as he had been taught.
More information:
brainly.com/question/18111220?referrer=searchResults
