Answer:
They sided with the french because the french had already established treaties and such with them so they could safely fur trap, while the british where conquering more and more of their territory uncaring about relations with the natives, becoming more of a menace to their society.
Explanation:
Answer:
1) A jury hears arguments during a trial. (2) The defendant may appeal the verdict.
Explanation:
<em>Many incidents are chosen for an "oral argument" ere the forum. Oral reasons in the courtyard of requests is a structured conversation amongst the appellate advocates and the committee of justices concentrating on the constitutional laws in conflict. Each side is given a small time — normally about 15 minutes — to give reasoning to the court.</em>
Answer: I think french. . . .
Answer:
a plantation owner in the low country
Explanation:
The Democratic-Republican party was one of the two most common parties in the 1700s in the United States.
The party which differs from the Federalist party in policies and ideologies favored the idea of making the United States economy built on agriculture with the hope that the United States would be the agricultural provider for all foreign countries across the globe.
The party also favored all U.S. families to possess their personal farm.
Hence, "a plantation owner in the low country" would have most likely supported the Democratic-Republican Party in the late 1700s
Answer:
The Incan Empire was a huge empire in South America, spanning the western coast of the continent. It reached its peak from 1438 to 1533, and its last stronghold was conquered by the Spanish in 1572. The Incan Empire was very unique, in that its civilization lacked the things usually associated with prosperity and sophistication, like wheels, iron or steel, and even a system of writing.
Explanation:
Hope this helped!
