Answer:
10.53%
Explanation:
In this question, we use the RATE formula that is shown in the attachment. Kindly find it below:
Data provided
Present value = $34,500
Future value or Face value = $0
PMT = $4,200
NPER = 11 years × 2 = 22 years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after solving this, the rate of return is 10.53%
Answer:
$0
Explanation:
Based on the information given No annual amortization of goodwill for this acquisition based on the fact that GOODWILL as an asset will remain forever because they won't dilapidate or worn out which is why GOODWILL are not amortized and Secondly we cannot see or touch GOODWILL which is why they are called intangible asset .
Therefore the annual amortization of goodwill for this acquisition will be $0.
Answer: C)
Explanation:
A dealer in British pounds is considering a person who is buying British pound( or any other currency) deposit in a bank that is located in Great Britain( or somewhere else, depending on currency).
If a dealer knows that the pound is about to appreciate it is good for him to lower his bid price and his ask price which are both considering share of stock. The bid price is referring to the price that someone who is buying is wanting to pay and the ask price is referring to selling price that someone will also want to take.
Answer:
The correct answer is B: the jobs produced during the period have been under-costed
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
If manufacturing overhead has been under-allocated during the period, then which of the following is true?
(a) the jobs produced during the period have been over-costed
(b) the jobs produced during the period have been under-costed
(c) the jobs produced during the period have been costed correctly
(d) none of the above
When manufacturing overhead has been under-allocated means that the actual costs incurred where superior that the estimated cost for the period.
In the economy of Wrexington in 2008, consumption was $1000, exports were $100, government purchases were $450, imports were $150, and investment was $350, then
⇒$1750, was Wrexington's GDP in 2008
(add all, subtract 150 which is the imports)
GDP = personal consumption + gross investment + government consumption + net exports of goods and services
Personal Consumption
Gross Investment
Government Consumption
Exports
Imports
GNP = employee compensation + proprietors' income + rental income + corporate profits + interest income
GDP = GNP + indirect business taxes + depreciation + net income of foreigners*
Hence, option A is correct.
To learn more about GDP here
brainly.com/question/15682765
#SPJ4