Answer:
The first response
Explanation:
The first response is the only claim that makes sense. To check, let's use the process of elimination.
Second: Calling the scientists' surveys unsophisticated is irrelevant and does not prove that the original claim is correct.
Third: This option does not address the points made by the counterclaim and instead pushes the original idea. It is important to remember that it is supposed to be a response, not a new statement.
Fourth: This response gives up on the original idea and ends the debate, with the counterclaim winning.
A speech urging students to elect you as class president
If its an analogy, Its easier to do it in a sentence.
A prodigy had a lot of talent.
The answer is, a Zealot has a lot of conviction.
( I had a question like that before that's how I know but I think its Zealot. )
