<span>The answer is preemption. The preemption doctrine raises to
the idea that a higher authority of law will move the law of a lower authority
of law when the two authorities come into conflict or encounter. When federal
and state law conflict, federal law shifts, or preempts, state law, due to
the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. U.S. Const. art. VI.,
§ 2. Preemption relates nevertheless of whether the conflicting laws come
from legislatures, courts, administrative agencies, or constitutions. For instance,
the Voting Rights Act, an
act of Congress, anticipates state constitutions, and FDA regulations may
preempt state court judgments in cases concerning prescription drugs.</span>
Hi! i think you might’ve meant students. if so, stress, the urge to fit in, the need to feel cool, and media influence
Hi. I'm not sure if there are more details to your question but here's my thoughts about what structural interviewing is. It is a type of quantitative research method that aims to make sure that all interviews are given with the same exact questions in sequence.
There is not enough information provided, can you give details?
The fallacy that is described by your friend's belief that there is no more segregation is B) legalistic fallacy.
<h3>What is legalistic fallacy?
</h3>
This is the belief that there is no more racism in a certain sector simply because there are laws that exist against that sort of racism.
Your friend here does not believe in racist segregation because there are laws against it so this must be a legalistic fallacy.
In conclusion, option B is correct.
Find out more on racial fallacies at brainly.com/question/26683818.
