Need more information to answer this question
<em>There are 4 problems and listed solutions in Percy Jackson and Sea of Monsters:
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>The second book and movie from the Percy Jackson series is entitled Sea of Monsters which is about Percy Jackson, a demi-god, son of Poseidon and a mortal woman accepted a quest to travel to Sea of Monsters to get a hand on a Golden Fleece. A golden fleece is a legendary blanket in Greek mythology that has healing powers. Percy needs it for the healing of Thalia's tree, a tree that serves as a protector of Camp Half-Blood, a place where Percy and other demi-gods are learning and staying. </em>
<em>The main characters are: Percy, Annabeth, Luke, Grover and Chiron. Settings are in sea, Sea of Monsters, Camp Half-Blood, and more.
</em>
<em>Listed below are the conflicts in the movie:
</em>
<em>1. The Thalia tree was poisoned by Luke. Percy and her friends must get the Golden Fleece to cure the tree.
</em>
<em>2. Percy and her friends are being held prisoners in the ship when they rode a cruise ship going to the Sea of Monsters. They got escaped because of their things from Camp Half-Blood.
</em>
<em>3. When Luke got the Golden Fleece, he used it to revive Kronos. The titan who was overthrown by Zeus. Percy must fight Kronos. Percy fights him and he won.
</em>
<em>4. Grover was captured by a Cyclop and later on reunited with Percy and his friends. </em>
<em>
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em />
Arthur should not forgive Lancelot due to his disloyalty because it greatly affected him and his life. His wife, Guinevere, was having an affair with Lancelot and it took a toll on him. Arthur should only forgive Lancelot if Lancelot earned his trust back once again.
Sir Gawain is loyal to King Arthur because he proved that he can be loyal and chivalrous when no one stood up against the Green Knight. He stood up against the Green Knight despite the fact that he was still not a knight.
Yes, loyalty can be restored even if it was once lost. It can be restored as long as the person was willing to trust the person who betrayed him once again and if the person who betrayed him earned back his trust.
Answer:
the one the question is refering to.
The writing 'rule' (myth) Churchill's reply satirizes is the 'Never end a sentence on a preposition' rule (i.g. as I intetionally did on the immediate sentence before this one). And his reply to it was something like 'This is the type of errant pedantry up with which I will not put.'
The 'rule' is a myth, yes, but of course what Churchill did was an exaggeration to sneeringly point out the ignorance of those who criticized him.
His sentence therefore was incorrect. One possible change to improve it could be: 'This is the type of errant pedantry which I will not put up with.'
Specially the 'up' and 'with' of 'put up with' could never go in the middle of a sentence, as 'put up with' is a phrasal verb, meaning the verb and the preposition must always be together in the correct order.
I was able to find some possible variations of what his sentence could have actually had been, but in none of them the 'up with' goes along with 'put', so either ways we can assume that his sentence was deliberately wrong.
Explanation:
brainly
