1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dahasolnce [82]
3 years ago
6

Who has amari texted last? children of blood and bone ASAP

English
1 answer:
Anna11 [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

aa

Explanation:

a

You might be interested in
The temperature dropped significantly after the sun set; I was pleased I had brought a sweatshirt with me
eduard
I dont quite understand, Please re-fraise ?
6 0
3 years ago
Read the excerpt from Flannery O’Connor’s “The Life You Save May Be Your Own.” “A body and a spirit,” he repeated. “The body, la
eduard
The figurative language that is used by Mr Shiflet reveals that he is a character who is intelligent and wise. To be able to use an appropriate analogy requires knowledge and experience. This means that Mr Shiflet is old and has gone through a lot of things in his life.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a discussion, Peter shares his opinion about playing in the marching band: "Everyone should join the marching band! Making mu
Lady bird [3.3K]
From the above excerpt the fact which best support Peter's opinion is that STUDENTS WHO PLAY AN INSTRUMENT GET BETTER GRADES THAN STUDENTS WHO DO NOT. This can be inferred from the passage: Peter considered playing an instrument a lot of fun; playing musical instruments is great for brain development. It helps the brain develop neurophysiological distinction which helps students distinguish between certain sounds that can aid in literacy.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Quindlen begins by disagreeing with a fellow writer. How and how fairly does she represent the opposing point of view?
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer:Quindlen was criticizing the application of standardized testing (perhaps in the wake of the controversial "No Child Left Behind" act which some say placed too much emphasis on standardized testing). Quindlen's argument is that if standardized testing is to be used, it should at least be interesting and more importantly, such testing should not edit works of literature to the point at which significant meaning is lost. Actually, she is arguing that literature should not be edited at all.  

Quindlen doesn't think children are too feeble and weak to read controversial issues because they are exposed to such issues through the media and Internet every day. In fact, by sanitizing (editing out anything remotely controversial) literature, the test will not challenge the student.  

Those who design the test claim that anything controversial might distract the student and affect his/her performance. Quindlen's response is that the kids can handle it and more to the point, if all remotely controversial issues are edited out, what is left can hardly been interesting or engaging. Also, to edit in this way is historically irresponsible. Quindlen notes that in Isaac Singer's excerpt about being a young Jew in prewar (World War II) Poland, all references to Jews and Poles were taken out.  

Quindlen notes that there are other consequences of this editing. One is that the students will determine from this that those designing the test have no faith in their (the students') ability to handle differing perspectives and challenging intellectual material. Quindlen argues that this is sending the message to children that "we don't think you're smart enough."  

But what do the kids learn from this? That the written word doesn't really matter much, that it can be weakened at will. That no one trusts a student to understand that variations in opinion and background are both objectively interesting and intellectually challenging.  

This also tells the student that there is no power to the written word (as literature, laws, etc.) if we can simply edit things that don't appeal to a particular way of thinking. So, clearly Quindlen is against this manipulation of literature, in these tests and in general, for a number of reasons, all logical. This kind of editing also sets a dangerous precedent where those in power of educating children have the ability to subject students to a particular worldview that they only assume is the best for everyone. This is quite audacious and ignores one of the hallmarks of American culture: diversity.

Explanation:

hope you get your thing correct

4 0
3 years ago
Anybody out here got me??
goblinko [34]

Answer: it would be D or you can do process of elimination

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What do you worry about in social situations? Does it cause anxiety? Why or why not ?​
    6·1 answer
  • The words geology York and geode share a common root word based on the root word what do I do three words have in common
    10·1 answer
  • A group of friends chat about the latest trends. passive oor active?
    5·2 answers
  • Not only were Russian farms run on unfree labor, but they used very simple, old-fashioned methods of farming. Like the English b
    12·1 answer
  • Does learning have a positive effect on a persons life
    6·1 answer
  • How does this passage contribute to the overall meaning of the story
    8·2 answers
  • No se ingles Help , gracias <3
    11·1 answer
  • What is your biggest fear?
    13·1 answer
  • Annie Dillard's “Living Like Weasels" is best described as an example of
    8·2 answers
  • Language and style in the poem the raider of the treasure trove analysis of the poem the raider of the treasure trove
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!