The answer is b hop I help you
The answer to your question would be that the definition that best identifies and explains the function of the word "tying" as it is used in this sentence is the following one: In the selected sentence, the word "tying" is a verbal that functions as an adverb.
A verbal is a word formed from a verb but functioning as a different part of speech. "Tying his shoe" is a participle phrase. In fact, it is present participle phrase, as it is created from the form of a verb used with the verb to be as an auxiliary verb (progressive tense). Removing the auxiliary verb and using the -ing form of the main verb produces a present participle. In this case the participle is functioning as an adverb because it is telling something about the manner in which Garrett prevented an embarrassing fall. He did this tying his shoe. You can tell this by asking the following question: How did Garrett prevent the embarrassing fall? Tying his shoe.
Answer:
Situational irony.
Explanation:
Irony is saying one thing but meaning quite the opposite. It is mostly used for a humorous effect.
There are different types of ironies- <u>dramatic irony, situational irony, verbal irony</u>, etc. And the given example is situational irony.
Situational irony is when the situation is opposite to what is meant. Likewise, Chef Kylie may be a professional chef, proven by his signature dish, triple-dipped chip steak. This means he's good at cooking meat. But at the same time, he is a vegan, meaning his profession and personal lifestyle are opposite. It is ironic for he is a vegan who loves and is an expert in cooking meat.
In this quote, Scout wants to highlight how difficult it was for a black man to get access to justice at the time. She tells us that Tom Robinson had been given "due process of law." This implies that Tom Robinson was treated fairly in the eyes of the law because he had had a lawyer and a trial.
However, Scout also highlights the fact that, besides these advantages, Robinson's trial was definitely not fair and just. In fact, he was harshly judged because of his skin colour, which many people took to be almost evidence of Robinson's guilt. Therefore, as Scout highlights, Tom had "lost" in front of his peers, and he was never able to gain support from people who were against him from the beginning. Tom had lost the case in the "secret court of men's heart."
Answer:
tbh i dont even kno wha dat even is
Explanation:
