I think the term that best applies to it is historical materialism. It focuses on the dialectics of understanding history using contradictions in politics, economy, culture and social changes inside a society. These cause the development and changes to further improve and have another society that would cater the people's interest.
Answer:
The power the government has over the military and other armed forces is extense. The government could use the military to stop a social movement or a strike. In terms of sheer ability, the government can order the military to act, and be held responsible for the consequences. However, under the Rule of Law, the government does not have the political authority to do so. As it cannot act against the rights and liberties of people. The Rule of Law prevents precisely that: an arbitrary action from the government against its own citizens. The moment a government uses its power arbitrarily and without political authority, the Rule of Law is broken.
Explanation:
The Norman conquest of England, led by William the Conqueror (r. 1066-1087 CE) was achieved over a five-year period from 1066 CE to 1071 CE. Hard-fought battles, castle building, land redistribution, and scorched earth tactics ensured that the Normans were here to stay. The conquest saw the Norman elite replace that of the Anglo-Saxons and take over the country’s lands, the Church was restructured, a new architecture was introduced in the form of motte and bailey castles and Romanesque cathedrals, feudalism became much more widespread, and the English language absorbed thousands of new French words, amongst a host of many other lasting changes which all combine to make the Norman invasion a momentous watershed in English history.
Answer:
answers should be on quizlet
Explanation:
