3 years ago

Is destruction of property a legitimate and acceptable form of protest? Why or why not? yes

2 answers:

8 0

Answer:

No it is not, it is one thing to protest, that is okay, but burning buildings destroying property, is a little over the top.

Explanation:

zalisa [80]3 years ago

3 0

Answer: No

Explanation: Destruction of property could land you a felony or misdemeanor criminal damaging or endangering charge. Protests are meant to be the good example of how to make change without needing to destroy property.

You might be interested in

The secularism of the Renaissance was a shift from what feature of medieval life?

Lunna [17]

C - emphasis on religious values

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What are the main issue on war on drugs?

Gnesinka [82]

Answer:

The war on drugs is a global campaign, led by the U.S. federal government, of drug prohibition, military aid, and military intervention, with the aim of reducing the illegal drug trade in the United States.

Thank you

6 0

3 years ago

Why were colonial minutemen so prepared for the arrival of the British in Concord? SELECT ALL THAT APPLY

borishaifa [10]

Answer:

b and d i believe

Explanation:

this is a shot in the dark I'll be honest. But it isn't c and I don't remember A

3 0

3 years ago

Which phrase describes the political condition in which a single ruler exercises absolute authority and is not bound by any law?

vivado [14]

The answer is B it is a man ruling

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of these statements most accurately describes the role of African-American in the civil war effort on the union side

zloy xaker [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago