1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pshichka [43]
3 years ago
15

Would you rather save a puppy or kitten

English
1 answer:
Taya2010 [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A puppy.

Explanation:

A puppy, because it doesn't scratch off the curtains and cats are a lot messier.   From what I say puppies are also way cute the kittens

You might be interested in
Pls help me! I’m stuck on this problem! I will give points to whoever make this clear! Thank you!
lions [1.4K]

Answer: he went through a lot (c)

Explanation: Conventional quantum field theories work well in describing the results of experiments at high-energy particle smashers such as CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, where the Higgs was discovered, which probe matter at its smallest scales. But if you want to understand how things work in many less esoteric situations – how electrons move or don’t move through a solid material and so make a material a metal, an insulator or a semiconductor, for example – things get even more complex.

The billions upon billions of interactions in these crowded environments require the development of “effective field theories” that gloss over some of the gory details. The difficulty in constructing such theories is why many important questions in solid-state physics remain unresolved – for instance why at low temperatures some materials are superconductors that allow current without electrical resistance, and why we can’t get this trick to work at room temperature.

But beneath all these practical problems lies a huge quantum mystery. At a basic level, quantum physics predicts very strange things about how matter works that are completely at odds with how things seem to work in the real world. Quantum particles can behave like particles, located in a single place; or they can act like waves, distributed all over space or in several places at once. How they appear seems to depend on how we choose to measure them, and before we measure they seem to have no definite properties at all – leading us to a fundamental conundrum about the nature of basic reality.

This fuzziness leads to apparent paradoxes such as Schrödinger’s cat, in which thanks to an uncertain quantum process a cat is left dead and alive at the same time. But that’s not all. Quantum particles also seem to be able to affect each other instantaneously even when they are far away from each other. This truly bamboozling phenomenon is known as entanglement, or, in a phrase coined by Einstein (a great critic of quantum theory), “spooky action at a distance”. Such quantum powers are completely foreign to us, yet are the basis of emerging technologies such as ultra-secure quantum cryptography and ultra-powerful quantum computing.

But as to what it all means, no one knows. Some people think we must just accept that quantum physics explains the material world in terms we find impossible to square with our experience in the larger, “classical” world. Others think there must be some better, more intuitive theory out there that we’ve yet to discover.

In all this, there are several elephants in the room. For a start, there’s a fourth fundamental force of nature that so far quantum theory has been unable to explain. Gravity remains the territory of Einstein’s general theory of relativity, a firmly non-quantum theory that doesn’t even involve particles. Intensive efforts over decades to bring gravity under the quantum umbrella and so explain all of fundamental physics within one “theory of everything” have come to nothing.

Meanwhile cosmological measurements indicate that over 95 per cent of the universe consists of dark matter and dark energy, stuffs for which we currently have no explanation within the standard model, and conundrums such as the extent of the role of quantum physics in the messy workings of life remain unexplained. The world is at some level quantum – but whether quantum physics is the last word about the world remains an open question.

Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/definition/quantum-physics/#ixzz6v8lQ13km

6 0
3 years ago
NEED HELP WILL MARK BRAINEST AND 30 POINTS......
Ivenika [448]

Answer:

What makes you a better person everyday?

Well, what makes me a better person each day, is by being most certainly respectful to all others, try to help other people when they most need it, Always be the one trying new things. I also think everyday is a new start, you have to follow the rules, while still having fun, you have to learn new thing, and meet new people. and you should never judge someone just because of their "cover" or so to speak. But just by doing all this everyday, you become better than you were i believe.

Explanation:

hope this help. plz mark brainliest

4 0
3 years ago
What stage in the history of the novel helped create a larger demand for the form?
Ostrovityanka [42]
The answer is the first one
7 0
3 years ago
Do you believe in astrology if yes then why​
igor_vitrenko [27]
This is what I would say!

I believe astrology is an outdated system and can no longer be relied upon. The pseudoscience depends upon spiritual figures which hold no explanation for why it can answer questions.
5 0
3 years ago
Instructions:
Alex

Candidates Who Can Help Take Back the House : Democrats in six races in New York and New Jersey can see their party restore good sense in Congress. The New York Times Editorial Board. Oct. 20, 2018

The editorial piece was written by the editorial board of the New York Times on October 20th, 2018.

It deals with the upcoming mid-term elections in America. The editors take a very strong position against the Trump Administration as the very title of the editorial makes clear, implying that good sense has been lost in congress and, therefore, must be restored.

Their criticism about the Trump government is strong and shared by many Americans, but in they refrain from using data or some specific facts and support their position on a generic feeling based platform that may be effective only to those that agree with them.

However, the specific point of the article - about the possibilities of gaining important seats in congress - is well substantiated with strategic voting discussions and statistics.

The editor appeal to readers' emotion by implying things can be changed if they can get some of the seats and rally for democrats to vote in mass.

That subject is widely discussed in the media having different perspectives taken into account. for CNN and MSNBC mainly, the articles touches on a very critical point and their commentators strongly agree with the content. Fox news take a different approach, having some of their specialist panels classifying such editorial piece as wishful thinking without any chance to occur.

The interviews with the public shows a strong polarisation, with masses of people rallying in favour of their party, each TV channel chooses to emphasise their own perspective by painting their supporters as representatives of the democratic system whereas those that disagree with them are seen like potential threats to democracy.

It is possible to say that on discussing politics in America an unbiased position is almost impossible to be found. It is like pundits, reporters and the media in general have decided to let emotions run high in detrimental of a reasonable discussion about the facts.

Both sides make strong and baseless generalisations, adopting a Manichean perspective of "them against us".

 


3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • List some important ideas that dragonwings includes.
    7·2 answers
  • Which formatting technique is best used to make finding specific information
    13·1 answer
  • Having little problems can anyone please help me in understanding this.
    15·1 answer
  • describe the impact obtaining a college degree will have on those who came before you and those who may follow in your footsteps
    15·1 answer
  • Identify the PARTICIPIAL PHRASE in the following sentence.
    9·1 answer
  • Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason tow
    12·1 answer
  • Situation
    10·1 answer
  • Read the passage. First identify the text structure used in the passage, and then explain how this structure helps develop the w
    6·1 answer
  • List at least twenty things that you think you will need to budget for once you are out on your own
    9·1 answer
  • Self-Evaluation
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!