I say its...
Traveling toward the west, the caravan made slow but steady progress.
Hope it helped :)
"The prince" was the first book that didn't take politics as something ethical or philosophical. Machiavelli wrote it to Lorenzo di Medici as a "guide" to maintain his power. Ancient philosophers were focused on constucting the ideal state. That means, they mentioned the characteristics of a succesfull monarchy for example, but did not considered the things as they were at that moment. Readers find disturbing the tactics that Machiavelli describes to gain or maintain power as they include making people fear you or destroying your enemies. This book is always resumed with the phrase "The end justifies the means", making it clear that the rulers can do anything to maintain their power.
The controversy is understandable, this books shows how cruel can reality be and how politics scrifice ethics in the name of power. The discussion is still relevant nowadays. How far can politicians go to win an election?
Answer:
Explanation:
uncomfortable
uh, this was the answer I'm over here looking for some big uncommon word.
Answer:
<em>The </em><em>nosy</em><em> visitors observed the lions' routine for nearly an hour before moving on.</em>
Explanation:
In this passage, we have a description of an average safari with a lot of tourists trying to capture the perfect photo, no matter what it takes. It is obvious that the lions are not a fan of it, as the people keep mingling around them, staring, making noise, etc, so it is almost like in a zoo. So, the author used the neutral word <em>curious</em>, while <em>nosy</em>, meaning <em>being too much into others` business</em>, is more suitable, but only if we want, like it is said, to create a more negative connotation.
