A low firm tone not to high not to low
When making an inference, the reader should be sure to support the inference with evidence. Hope it helps :)
The review of the argument of the writer is as follows:
- He makes use of the bandwagon fallacy when he talks about the statistics of people who said Daylight Savings has made them less productive.
- The argument would have been more convincing if he had made use of good supporting details.
<h3>What is an Argument?</h3>
This refers to the use of words and logic in order to convince a person about a given perspective or position on a particular topic.
Hence, we can see that the writer makes an argument to abolish Daylight Savings and tries to be forceful about it, without the use of proper supporting details.
He does not include the source of the research that talks about the 88% of workers who said Daylight Savings reduced their productivity, and he also made use of the bandwagon fallacy.
Read more about bandwagon fallacy here:
brainly.com/question/1058000
#SPJ1
The change in the description of the house occurs because Abigail realizes that the house has the potential to be the way she wants it and that makes her happy.
From the reading of "Letter to Her Daughter from the New White House," we can conclude that:
- The letter is an account by Abigail Adams about the White House.
- She shows all the characteristics of the house, being very descriptive and absorbs everything, especially the negative points that the house presents.
- Abigail is very observant of these negative points, which makes the reader think that she is hating the place.
- But actually, she is very happy, because the letter shows that she is delighted to look at the house. After all, she knows that with a good renovation, the house will be the way she wants.
In addition, Abigail recognizes the importance of the house and what it stands for, so she doesn't mind having to "fix" some defects.
More information:
brainly.com/question/11540336?referrer=searchResults
