The poem "The Road Not Taken" by Robert Frost is about making decisions in life whose consequences may not be clear at first, as is further explained below.
<h3>What is the poem about?</h3>
"The Road Not Taken" is a poem by Robert Frost whose theme concerns decisions. The speaker arrives at a crossroads and, without knowing where each road leads, must choose one of them to continue his journey.
The speaker chooses the road he thinks suits him better, but there is no way of knowing what the consequences of such decision will be in the future. Nevertheless, since there is no coming back, he will have to live with the consequences and make the best out of it all.
The roads function as a metaphor for the decisions we have to make in life. Even if we cannot see ahead, into the future, we must choose and then deal with the consequences bravely. Life is, after all, a series of small and big decisions.
Learn more about "The Road Not Taken" here:
brainly.com/question/11861839
#SPJ1
Answer:
William Shakespeare. His extant works, including collaborations, consist of approximately 39 plays, 154 sonnets, two long narrative poems, and a few other verses, some of uncertain authorship. His plays have been translated into every major living language and are performed more often than those of any other playwright.
Explanation:
This might help you
The dissenters in the flag-burning case and their supporters might at this juncture note an irony in my argument. My point is that freedom of conscience and expression is at the core of our self-conception and that commitment to it requires the rejection of official dogma. But how is that admittedly dogmatic belief different from any other dogma, such as the one inferring that freedom of expression stops at the border of the flag?
The crucial distinction is that the commitment to freedom of conscience and expression states the simplest and least self-contradictory principle that seems to capture our aspirations. Any other principle is hopelessly at odds with our commitment to freedom of conscience. The controversy surrounding the flag-burning case makes the case well.
The controversy will rage precisely because burning the flag is such a powerful form of communication. Were it not, who would care? Thus were we to embrace a prohibiton on such communication, we would be saying that the 1st Amendment protects expression only when no one is offended. That would mean that this aspect of the 1st Amendment would be of virtually no consequence. It would protect a person only when no protection was needed. Thus, we do have one official dogma-each American may think and express anything he wants. The exception is expression that involves the risk of injury to others and the destruction of someone else`s property. Neither was present in this case.
The answer is a. Wary means to be cautious and hesitant means to stop and be cautious