1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marina86 [1]
3 years ago
13

If our school decided to get rid of all rules and give students complete freedom, what do you think would happen? Would students

do their work? Would they take responsibility for caring for the school and each other? Or would everything turn to chaos? Why?
(Write a paragraph 150 words)​
English
1 answer:
kirill [66]3 years ago
8 0
If school decided to get rid of all rules then I think everything will potentially turn to chaos as there isn’t any model or footsteps to follow. Children have a curious mind and want to explore more day by day. By no rules or guidance put in place, children can easily get lost and create their own sets of behaviors and morals. Also, students are not capable yet to follow instructions and maintain peace during classroom instructions yet. Complete freedom for children might also lead to severe actions like harassment and bullying.
You might be interested in
Who wrote the canterbury tales?
ivanzaharov [21]
The author of the Canterbury Tales is Geoffery Chaucer
4 0
4 years ago
How is human language “species-specific and species-uniform”?<br>plz urgent question
Sergeeva-Olga [200]

<span>Language is said to be species-specific because only humans posses language, and species-uniform because every normal human posses language. It is truth that other animals posses various degrees of communication systems, but they are not complex enough to be considered language. In addition, even though the ability of acquiring a language is genetically inherit, the specific language that a child acquires is completely obtained trough the cultural environment.</span>

3 0
3 years ago
PART A: According to the passage, how have humans primarily used artificial light? 0 0 A to keep animals away B to make their da
Anarel [89]

Answer:

artificial light was primarily used to make days longer as candles could only burn for so long before going out and usually when it got dark people couldn't continue their activities  

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
30 pts
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How is Old Yeller able to save Little Arliss when his brother and mother were not able to?
lesya [120]
Old yeller saved Arliss from the mother bear because she thought Arliss was hurting her cub
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What historical event gained more popularity for The Catcher in the Rye?
    12·1 answer
  • A business letter is more formal than a friendly letter. True/ False
    11·2 answers
  • Please helpRead this passage:
    14·2 answers
  • Why was the catcher in the rye written?
    7·1 answer
  • Define sexist please explain this to me
    11·2 answers
  • Jane austen's pride and prejudice novel is about what
    13·1 answer
  • Need ASAP ASAP ASAP asap
    12·2 answers
  • How can we effectively handle conflict and misunderstanding?
    11·2 answers
  • “Lights in the windows”
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the difference between a monologue and soliloquy?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!