Hi there!
The best description of the Supreme Court's ruling in Bush v. Gore is...
<span>D. The Court ruled that election recounts in Florida were being conducted in a manner that violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, and therefore had to stop.
</span>
In the case of Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court ruled that the vote recount in Florida was unconstitutional because it violated voters equal protection under the law. The justices also found the Florida Supreme Court's ruling to be unconstitutional, deeming that the court was making up new election laws; a power that belongs to the legislature. The reason the recount was considered a violation of the equal protection of the laws was because it was determined that "arbitrary and disparate" treatment of voters ballots after the fact devalued the votes.
Answer:
Option: B) the ruling in the "Dred Scott" case.
Explanation:
The Compromise of 1850 reduced the political dispute between slave and free states (the South and the north). The Compromise of 1850 tried to settle conflicts over slavery as new territories joined America after the Mexican-American War. It admitted California as a free with no slavery, left New Mexico and Utah to decide themselves. It made it easier for slave owners to reclaim runways following the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.
