On the 9th of December 1948, the United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 260 (III) A as the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This seeks to prevent and to punish persons from committing genocide. There are currently 143 contracting parties to the Convention which includes the United States, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Singapore, Australia, France, among others. In Article 2 of the Convention, genocide is defined as any act that is committed with the intention of destroying a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, in part or as a whole. These acts include: (1) killing members of the group, (2) inflicting serious physical or mental harm, (3) deliberately manipulating the life conditions of the group in order to destroy it physically, (4) exacting methods of preventing within the group, and (5) forcibly removing children within the group to transfer them to another group. Article 3 states that any person who is found to (1) commit, (2) conspire to commit, (3) directly and publicly provoking to commit, (4) attempt to commit, and (5) aid in committing genocide shall be punished.
It is civic obligation I think I hope this helps!
During Reconstruction, Johnson's influence can be described as "He did not have the political support that Lincoln had."
<h3>Why did he not have political support?
</h3>
Lincoln was a Republican and Congress was controlled by Republicans. Lincoln therefore had a lot of support in Congress.
Johnson on the other hand, was a Democrat who did not want the same things Republicans wanted. He therefore had little support in Congress, and was constantly overruled.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on Johnson and Reconstruction at brainly.com/question/612359.
The most likely answer for this question would be internal revolutions and revolts.
This would probably be applicable not just to an empire but to most growing communities. Having a high agricultural potential would mean that the sustainability of their growth is high. An adequate military resources would assure the safe growth of the community or empire. State and local governments would maintain and oversee the growth into its utmost potential and the efficiency of the growth be considered in future plans Internal revolutions and revolts, however, would result to damages not just to the physical structure of the empire, but also to its people. Thus, not just having the whole thing back to square one, but also slowing the progress that is eventually made.
