I would assume you are trying to ask "what makes appeals to logic and ethics more successful?". In that case, it would be that they are founded in fact and have distinct argumentative points. This can be contrasted to appeals to emotion which may or may not be effective with the audience. As long as a logical argument is sound, and the audience is able to follow it, it will be more effective. Let me know if that doesn't answer your question.
Answer:
1) Wall
2) Homes
3) Zoo
4) Bicycle
Explanation:
An object is anything we can touch, feel or see but that is non-human.
Therefore in the sentences given, the objects are as follows;
1) Wall
2) Homes
3) Zoo
4) Bicycle
<span><span>Yes, the word "sand"
is indeed a homograph. Homographs are defined as words (usually pairs) having
the same spelling. They aren’t necessarily pronounced the same. In fact some
words completely change their meaning when there is a shift in the
pronunciation. But they should always be used in the proper context, since they
will have different meanings. In this case, "sand" is a homograph
since it can be used either "put or sprinkle sand", "polish
using a sandpaper", or "a granular substance formed from </span>soil
erosion".
</span>